Quantcast
Channel: Movies
Viewing all 8368 articles
Browse latest View live

Brian De Palma, legendary director of 'Scarface' and 'Carrie,' explains why he 'left Hollywood completely'

$
0
0

de palma poster A24 final

In the 1970s, movies were ruled by “New Hollywood.” Made up of the likes of Robert Altman, Woody Allen, Michael Cimino, and William Friedkin (to just name a few), these filmmakers had differing levels of success, but they attained legendary status by bringing a more adult, sobering storytelling to movie theaters in an era absorbed by the Vietnam War and the Civil Rights Movement.

A few known as the "Movie Brats" managed to create works that would redefine how generations of filmmakers work, and how we see movies now. Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, Francis Ford Coppola, Martin Scorsese, and Brian De Palma were the five core members. They quickly formed a close bond and pushed each other to make movies that audiences had never seen before. And they did, with "Jaws" (Spielberg), "Star Wars" (Lucas), "The Godfather" ("Coppola), "Taxi Driver" (Scorsese), and "Carrie" (De Palma).

De Palma was the glue of the group.

Looked up to thanks to his film-school success (often casting a young Robert De Niro), De Palma was never too shy to give his opinion. And he was known for fighting hard to get his vision, influenced greatly by Hitchcock, in works like “Sisters,” “Carrie,” “Blow Out,” “Scarface,” “Body Double,” “The Untouchables,” and “Mission: Impossible.”

In the new documentary “De Palma” (in theaters June 10), directed by Noah Baumbach (“The Squid and the Whale,” “Frances Ha”) and Jake Paltrow (“The Good Night”), the legend gives his usual unfiltered thoughts while looking back on his incredible career and explaining the struggles that went on behind the scenes.

Business Insider sat down with De Palma, 75, at the Metrograph in New York City (which is running a retrospective of his work in June) to talk about being brutally honest, ditching the Hollywood system, the movie he regrets making, and why he gave George Lucas a hard time about “Star Wars.”

de palma paltrow baumbachBusiness Insider: Did it take a lot of convincing by Noah and Jake to get you to agree to this?

Brian De Palma: No. No. No. No. It was very informal. I've known Noah for 20 years. Jake I met 10 years ago and we used to get together — because we all live in the same neighborhood — for dinner once a week.

BI: Do you guys still do that?

De Palma: Oh, yeah. It's like a directors' group at dinner and we would tell our various war stories and what we're working on. Then Noah and Jake were interested in this new digital camera and they wanted to do some tests for it. And having talked about various experiences over many years we decided that I would sit down in Jake's living room and Jake operated the camera and Noah monitored the sound and they would just ask me questions, basically saying what we had talked about over dinner. It was very informal. They had no idea what they were going to do with it. We shot it for a whole week.

BI: And were you thinking, "These are just shooting tests. I can say anything."

De Palma: Yeah, absolutely.

BI: But suddenly they came to you and said, "We want to make this into a movie"?

De Palma: No. The interviews were taken five years ago and in their moviemaking schedules they had time and decided they wanted to do something with it. And that's what they did.

BI: This sounds very similar to what you were involved with in the 1970s, building a community of directors — Scorsese, Coppola, Lucas, Spielberg.

De Palma: That's very true.

BI: There’s never been a competitiveness with other directors?

De Palma: People have always asked that, but even with our group in the '70s, as successful as those directors were, there was never a competitiveness. It's kind of odd. We were young directors trying to get into the Hollywood system on some level and we all basically met at Warner Bros., and all had disastrous experiences, which I guess bound us together for life. We used to hang out together in Hollywood. We were young men. Going out to dinner together. I miss that. I remember going to the premiere of “Goodfellas,” so that was the '90s, and by then we were beginning to disperse. We were going into different areas and weren't that close anymore, in the sense of calling each other up and saying, "Let's go have dinner." I missed that and that's when I went and assembled this next group.

BI: Did you ever find yourself competing for projects with them?

De Palma: Not really. I don't think we ever competed for projects because Steven was off in his own world and George was making "Star Wars" movies. It's interesting, some of them, like Francis, were very interested in making studios.

BI: Did Francis want you involved with American Zoetrope [the studio Coppola attempted to make]?

De Palma: Marty [Scorsese] and I went and saw Zoetrope. I remember seeing the flatbed editing machines. Marty and I went because Marcia Lucas [George Lucas' wife at the time] was editing Marty's movie. She edited “Taxi Driver.” [She was a supervising film editor.] So we went up and stayed with George. But what Francis was doing wasn't for me.

movie brats Mark J. TerrillBI: In 2007, Lucas, Coppola, and Spielberg introduced the best director Oscar, which went to Scorsese. Why weren't you also onstage with them?

De Palma: Yeah, that's interesting. You know, Vanity Fair wanted to do a picture of the five of us at one point in one of their Hollywood issues, and I was shooting a movie in Europe so I wasn't going to fly back to take this picture. I said, "No, thank you."

BI: But seeing Scrosese's friends handing him his first Oscar, it was puzzling to me that you weren't there.

De Palma: I was always the anti-establishment member of the group. I've never been nominated for an Oscar. I've never worked within the Hollywood establishment on any level. I made a lot of people very mad.

BI: But at the same time wealthy.

De Palma: Absolutely. We all made a lot of money. But I left the whole system and went to Europe after "Mission to Mars." I started making movies that were internationally financed. So I really left the Hollywood system completely. Steven is obviously in it, Francis is financing his own films, and George left completely.

BI: Have you talked to George since he sold Lucasfilm? Is he content with stepping away?

De Palma: I only know what Steven says. I think he misses it to some extent. Steven sees a lot more of George than I do. He went and sold his franchise to Disney and it's something he so carefully cultivated for so many decades so I don't know. I think he does miss it.

BI: One thing that grabbed me in the documentary was your openness about your relationship with your father. [Who was never around during De Palma's youth and, the director says, cheated on his mother with other women.] Do you think the stories you tell are based on your feelings toward him?

De Palma: Well, we're all a product of our upbringing to some extent. But my older brother was very influential too because he sort of represents that egomaniac that appears in many of my movies. My father was basically a very hardworking orthopedic surgeon, very much involved in his work. Whatever happened between he and my mother by the time I was born, they were at odds with each other and just hung in there until I went to college, basically. So it's interesting, the times I spent with my father I can count on one hand. I remember going to see a John Wayne Western with him.

BI: Which one?

De Palma:The Horse Soldiers.” That's about it.

BI: But in “Home Movies,” the character Denis peeps on his father, which you say is based on you confronting your father with a knife and accusing him of adultery. Did doing that scene close a chapter in your relationship with him?

De Palma: I actually approached it as a comedy. A bizarre comedy. It all happened, but by the time I made the movie I saw the absurd aspects to it.

BI: Anything you regret saying in “De Palma”?

De Palma: No, because when you're talking with people about experiences in show business — whether they are actors, directors, cinematographers — they are usually extremely careful because they want to work again.

BI: I experience that on a daily basis.

De Palma: Right, as you know trying to get an interview where someone says something negative about anybody is very difficult. I'll never forget an actor talking about working with another actor, and they did the interview at an old-age home. They were like, "How did you like working with so-and-so?" And he said, "He was awful. He was just impossible." So that's how I went about this, a candid look at what it's really like.

wise guys mgmBI: The projects you turned down — “Fatal Attraction,” “Flashdance,” “Taxi Driver” — do you regret not taking any of those?

De Palma: Boy, that's a hard question to answer. I think Adrian [Lyne] did a very good job with “Fatal Attraction.” Now a movie I wish I hadn't done was “Wise Guys.” The studio changed their minds and didn't want to make it. They just wanted us to go away. I should have just taken my money and walked instead of dealing with a studio that didn’t want to make the movie.

BI: Legend has it you were very hard on George the first time he showed you guys "Star Wars."

De Palma: That is not correct. [Laughs] I am sarcastic. I am considered the class clown, but a sarcastic clown. So I would make fun of certain things. Because everyone would take this stuff too seriously.

BI: So you were just messing with him about not liking the opening crawl?

De Palma: No, the crawl didn't make any sense at all. And I kept kidding him about the Force. I was like, "What is the Force?" [Laughs] But you have to understand, we used to look at each other's movies in order to be helpful. We might say some things that weren’t nice. You know, I remember reading an account where Marcia [Lucas] was very upset with me. And I don't remember this, but there was an account where Marcia told me, "You've hurt George's feelings and you should be gentle with him." I don't remember that. I really don't know what they're talking about. I was basically myself. The thing the guys could always count on with me is I would say what I thought. I wasn't holding back. I remember having a big discussion with Steven about “Close Encounters.” There were some sections I thought didn't work. And this was considered a crowning success of his career. And I was like, "I don't know, this doesn't really work for me." [Laughs]

BI: Do you remember a part that didn't work for you?

De Palma: I don't remember. But I remember going to a screening up on 55th street and afterward going to him and saying, "I don't know, Steven." But I think we have to do that, and I do it with Noah and Jake and these directors. If they are going to show me something or I'm going to show something to them, I want them to say what they think and not what will make me feel better.

SEE ALSO: 11 movies you need to see this summer if you're not into superheroes or aliens

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 'Star Wars' director J.J. Abrams explains why inclusivity is good for everybody


14 hand-drawn sketches the ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’ director has teased for the sequel

$
0
0

guardians of the galaxy

There's not too much info we know about the "Guardians of the Galaxy" sequel. We know the main cast is returning in addition to a few new players, but who's the villain? And how will the sequel fit into the larger Marvel Cinematic Universe?

Director James Gunn has been sharing teases of the highly-anticipated sequel for weeks. Each Wednesday, he posts hand drawn storyboard art from the sequel to his Facebook using the tag #WhatWeShotWednesday. The images don't show too much. They can be vague and interpretive. But Gunn says he loves reading guesses for what the storyboards actually depict. He even responds to a few.

We've compiled all of the storyboards in the order they were realized along with fans' best guesses. 

Read on to check out all of the storyboard teases. "Guardians of the Galaxy vol. 2" arrives in theaters May 5 2017. 

Gunn started sharing his storyboard sketches mid-March with one that looked like a tiny Groot possibly getting attacked by a giant lizard.



If you zoom in you can just make out a squiggle on the head of the center figure. Fans think it may be Yondu's mohawk, and that he may have an army with him. Those look a lot like space ships in the background.



it's rumored the sequel will introduce Star Lord's father, whom he's never met. Gunn teased that he doubts fans will guess this one, but it's fans believe the written line is a voice-over and we'll see how Star Lord's mother and father met.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Jennifer Lawrence is set to star in a movie about the rise and fall of Theranos

$
0
0

Elizabeth Holmes, CEO of Theranos, attends a panel discussion during the Clinton Global Initiative's annual meeting in New York, September 29, 2015.  REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

One of the biggest business stories of the year is going to Hollywood.

Jennifer Lawrence is attached to star as Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes in a planned movie about the company, Deadline reports. Writer-director Adam McKay, whose movie "The Big Short" won the Oscar for best adapted screenplay, is behind the project.

Holmes started the company when she was 19, rocketing her way up to a company once valued at $9 billion. Theranos, a Silicon Valley-based blood-testing company, came under fire last year when the The Wall Street Journal reported its tests weren't producing accurate results and the company was trying to cover it up. Since then, the company has come under regulatory issues. It's corrected and voided tens of thousands of tests and Holmes' net worth has been struck down to $0 by Forbes.

Deadline did not report when production for the film might start or a potential release date.

Theranos told Business Insider it has no comment on the film project.

SEE ALSO: Theranos is at a critical turning point — what it does next could determine the company's future

DON'T MISS: Walgreens reportedly partnered with Theranos without checking its technology

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Sacha Baron Cohen recounts his 2003 Trump interview: 'I was the first person actually to realize that he’s a d---'

Jennifer Lawrence will star in a movie about Silicon Valley startup Theranos

$
0
0

jennifer lawrence elizabeth holmes theranos movie

Jennifer Lawrence will don the black turtleneck in a newly announced movie about medical company Theranos and its 32-year-old founder Elizabeth Holmes, the one-time darling of Silicon Valley.

Deadline learned in an exclusive that the drama (oh, there will be drama) will star Lawrence and be directed by Adam McKay, who won an Oscar for "The Big Short."

Theranos is a Silicon Valley startup that hoped to revolutionize the medical industry with a less invasive, finger-prick-only blood test and easier access to your results. The company came under fire in 2015 when a Wall Street Journal investigation called the company's much-touted secret blood-testing technologies into question.

Holmes, the very public face of the company, went from a net worth of $4.5 billion to zero, Forbes reports.

It's the kind of stuff you just can't make up. Lawrence and McKay seem like the perfect pair to bring the story to life.

Lawrence can't help but charm the pants off of audiences. Her cool girl-next-door demeanor will bring some much-needed likeability to Holmes' character.

McKay's credits include "Anchorman,""Step Brothers,""Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby," and most movies starring Will Ferrell. Last year's "The Big Short" marked a departure from his typical slapstick. The movie followed four denizens admidst the 2007 and 2008 financial crisis.

If McKay could turn the housing bubble into a digestible and hilarious movie, we have no doubt he will perform the same magic on the meltdown of Theranos.

Deadline did not report a potential release date for the movie.

SEE ALSO: A former employee says Google's smart contact lens is 'slideware' that exists only in PowerPoint presentations

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The 8 best science movies and shows on Netflix

Mel Gibson is working on a sequel to 'The Passion of the Christ,' and it could be a big comeback

$
0
0

the passion of the christ Newmarket Films final

It looks like the highest-grossing R-rated movie of all time is getting a sequel.

Mel Gibson, who directed "The Passion of the Christ," has teamed with screenwriter Randall Wallace — who penned Gibson's other hit directing effort, "Braveheart"— to write a sequel that will tell the story of the resurrection of Jesus, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

Wallace, who recently directed the 2014 faith-based drama "Heaven Is for Real," told THR that motivation to make a sequel has ramped up recently due to demand for it from the Christian community.

When "The Passion of the Christ" was first released in 2004, the movie became an instant hit, earning $83.8 million its opening weekend and going on to gross over $611 million worldwide (it was made for just $30 million), even though the dialogue was in Aramaic.

Thanks in large part to the evangelical community, which came out to see the film by the bus loads, "Passion" became the biggest R-rated moneymaker in the US.

"'The Passion' is the beginning and there's a lot more story to tell," Wallace told THR.

Gibson has been absent from the Hollywood spotlight thanks to his anti-Semitic remarks after being pulled over for driving under the influence 10 years ago and allegations of assault from his ex-girlfriend.

Those events made him "blacklisted" within the industry, as writer-director Shane Black ("The Nice Guys") told Business Insider recently.

But recently Gibson has been nearing a sort of comeback. He found acclaim at the Cannes Film Festival for his latest film, "Blood Father," and he's finishing up his next directing effort, the World War II drama "Hacksaw Ridge," starring Andrew Garfield. 

But if a "Passion" sequel is made and does anywhere close to the business of the original, Gibson would be once more one of the elite figures in the industry.

None of that will happen, however, for at least a few years. The sequel is in the early script stage and currently doesn't have any financial backing.

SEE ALSO: 28 celebrities who are taking a strong stand against Donald Trump

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 4 things you might have missed on this week’s 'Game of Thrones'

Watch 'Harry Potter' stars get sorted into their real houses and freak out

$
0
0

Rupert Grint Pottermore

Turns out, Ron Weasley isn't a Gryffindor. 

Rupert Grint, the actor who played Harry Potter's best friend for 10 years in the film franchise, was sorted along with a few of his costars into their real houses via a video for Pottermore, J.K. Rowling's website for fans to further their "Harry Potter" love.

For fans, the Sorting Hat quiz is of utmost importance. It either confirms your intellect and places you in Ravenclaw or puts you with the badgers in Hufflepuff.

After completing Pottermore's rigorous and personal quiz, Grint was sorted into Hufflepuff.

 Bonnie Wright, who played Ginny Weasley, carried on the Weasley legacy and is truly a Gryffindor.

Sporting sideburns and a mustache, Matthew Lewis, who played Neville Longbottom, grimaced as he was placed into Hufflepuff and then tried to pretend he wasn't devastated. What is a Hufflepuff, anyway

 

 

Evanna Lynch, who played Luna Lovegood, reacted in the way that a true fan would when she was sorted into Gryffindor.

 

Watch the full video here:

SEE ALSO: Here's what Harry Potter looks like as an adult

DON'T MISS: J.K. Rowling is begging people not to spoil the plot of her new play, 'Harry Potter and the Cursed Child'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 4 important things you probably missed on this week's 'Game of Thrones'

Oscar-nominated actress Glenn Close has a surprising small cameo in ‘Warcraft’ — here’s how it happened

$
0
0

Warning: There are some spoilers ahead for "Warcraft."

If you head out to see "Warcraft" this weekend — Legendary's take on the popular Blizzard video game series — you may spot a familiar face near the end of the movie.

Glenn Close shows up in a cameo so brief, you may turn to the person next to you in theaters and ask if that really is the Oscar-nominated actress in a video game movie.

You may have even spotted her in some TV spots for the movie.

glenn close warcraft

So how did Close wind up in the "Warcraft" movie?

The answer’s quite simple. Director Duncan Jones just asked and she said yes.

"I’m very fortunate that I’m very slowly but surely getting to a point in my career where I can invite people that I’m a huge fan of to sort of come and do things like that," director Duncan Jones tells Tech Insider. "I was able to get Kevin Spacey to work on my first film, 'Moon.' I was able to get Scott Bakula to come and do a cameo for 'Source Code,' and now, obviously I had the chance to get Glenn Close to come in and do a cameo on this film."

Close goes uncredited in the film, though IMDB credits her as Alodi, a half-elven male guardian in the series' universe, meaning the movie flipped the character's gender.

"It’s just one of those little enjoyable luxuries of being a director on a movie is you get to work with the people you rally admire," Jones adds. "She knew I was a fan of hers and she likes my movies and was willing to come and do a day of work with us."

It’s not clear whether Close is a "Warcraft" fan, too, but that could also be a possibility.

"Warcraft" is in theaters now.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Stunning video of what 'World of Warcraft' might look like if it were made today

7 movies and shows from women we're excited about

$
0
0

sense8

When Maureen Dowd of the New York Times interviewed dozens of female directors, writers, and producers in Hollywood, she found the industry seriously underestimates what women can do. Women directed just 7% of 2014's top films and, currently, major studios like Paramount and Fox don't have a single live-action film coming from a female director through 2018.

According to producer Jessica Elbaum, the industry is afraid to let women lead films that aren't explicitly "female stories."

"I think there’s a fear that females can only tell female stories, like if they’re given free rein, they’ll just write stories where everyone’s braiding each other’s hair and crying," said Elbaum.

The reality is entirely different. There are diverse projects coming from a variety of female screenwriters, directors, producers, and actresses. From spiritual family drama to big-budget action and surreal meta-comedy, women are subverting all of Hollywood's expectations for their gender and their genre, releasing some of the most transgressive and interesting material of the year. 

Keep reading to see seven awesome, works we're excited about right now from women. Take note, Hollywood.

"Sense8"

Created, written, and directed by the Wachowski siblings, Lana and Lilly, "Sense8" is an emotionally heavy sci-fi/adventure epic unlike anything on TV. Already renewed for a second Netflix season, "Sense8" follows eight strangers across the world who begin to telepathically experience each others lives.

A scientist in India suddenly feels rain on her skin when a mercenary in Germany, gets caught in a thunderstorm. A bus driver in Nairobi can suddenly fight with the same skill and experience as a trained fighter and businesswoman in South Korea. 

The plot is as jumbled and loopy as you'd expect from the creators of "The Matrix" and "Jupiter Ascending," but shines in making an extended point about empathy. Despite our huge differences in race, religion, gender, sexuality, we're all thinking, feeling human beings with more things uniting us than keeping us apart. We should strive to see how our identities unite, not divide us.

It's not exactly a new point, but "Sense8" explores it in wildly inventive, nuanced, and unexpected ways. The first season is streaming now on Netflix and season two is coming 2017.



"The Path"

Jessica Goldberg is the creator and executive producer of "The Path," a Hulu original series about crises of faith and family. With lead performances from Aaron Paul ("Breaking Bad"), Michelle Monaghan ("True Detective"), and Hugh Dancy ("Hannibal"), "The Path" follows a group of believers in Meyerism, a fictional religion created by Goldberg herself, as they prepare for life in the Garden, a Heaven on Earth for those who remain faithful. 

In a touching personal essay for The Hollywood Reporter, Goldberg reflected on drawing from her own grief and trauma to create the show:

"It started with a phone call from my mom, she was in the supermarket when it happened. Thirty-nine years of marriage, and my father turned to her and said, 'I'm seeing spots.' Three months later he died of cancer, and a year after that my own marriage fell apart. Just like that, everything I had taken to be true — my naïve understanding that life would somehow move along exactly the way I had planned it, was shattered. "

Just as Goldberg was tested and her life felt out of control, the characters of "The Path" try to hold on to each other as grief shapes their lives. Mixing spiritual examinations with great character drama, the show becomes a compelling, mature look at the cycles of trauma and recovery.



"Lady Dynamite"

Actress and comedian Maria Bamford's semi-autobiographical Netflix series, "Lady Dynamite," is hilarious, but it isn't a comedy. After a breakdown when her bipolar disorder becomes unmanageable, Maria returns to Hollywood to try and rebuild her career. 

Lady Dynamite is a joint project between Bamford and comedy vets, Pam Brady, one of the first writers on the original season of "South Park" and Mitch Hurwitz, creator of  "Arrested Development."The show jumps back and forth in time to simultaneously show both the steps leading to her breakdown and return to form in Hollywood. 

Bamford is as a veteran comedian and actress and, talking to Vulture, said creating and filming the show changed her appreciation of the industry.

"My new premise is that show business is kind of like a friend with a drinking problem: She's so fun and exciting and charismatic, but she may be in a blackout and you may not hear from her for months," she said. "It's not that she doesn't mean everything she says. Eventually, we did a pitch at Netflix and they said, "Go ahead with it." 

 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

'Lord of the Rings' megafans staged a huge re-enactment of a climactic battle

$
0
0

lord of the rings reuters photo battle

Hyper-dedicated fans of J.R.R. Tolkein's "Lord of the Rings" series — including the prequel, "The Hobbit"— got together to stage a homemade version of the climactic Battle of the Five Armies. These photos, taken in the Czech Republic, show off the incredible attention to detail of their weapons and armor, and luckily Reuters was there to capture it all.

This level of LARPing, aka live action role playing, takes serious dedication. The cosplayers have crafted axes and spears, and wear dense metal armor with painted heraldry drawn straight from the books.

Plus, it looked like a ton of fun.  

"Czech" out the cosplayers and their incredible weapons and armor below.

There were dozens of participants in the epic Battle of the Five Armies re-enactment, with several LARPers cosplaying as nonhuman enemies.



The five armies in the "Hobbit" novel included orcs and goblins, wargs, dwarves, elves, and humans.



The LARPers used face paint and make-up to transform into the evil armies of the orcs, goblins, and wargs.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

'Warcraft' is the worst-reviewed blockbuster of the summer so far — here's why

$
0
0

warcraft universal final

It's been a rough summer so far for movies. There are sequels no one wants to see, and, outside of Disney movies, there have only been a few hits. Sadly, this weekend will not change things.

Though the much-anticipated big-budget adaptation of one of the most popular video games ever created, "Warcraft," comes out on Friday, critics are telling us to run away from the movie that has Orcs and humans doing battle.

With a current rating of only 24% on Rotten Tomatoes, "Warcraft" is the worst-reviewed summer blockbuster of 2016 so far.

This could be a case of audiences and critics being split on a film, however. Overseas the movie has been out for a week and already made over $100 million. The domestic box office is certainly thirsty for a surprise hit.

But before you decide on buying a ticket, here's why critics think you should pass on the movie, which is being called a "once-in-a-generation disaster."

SEE ALSO: 28 celebrities who are taking a strong stand against Donald Trump

The CGI is at the level of (notorious bomb) 'John Carter.'

To correctly adapt a video game, you need to have some great computer graphics. That doesn't seem to happen here.

"Unlike, say, 'The Jungle Book,' which was entirely artificial yet came off as completely organic, it’s hard to lose sight of the green-screens here, especially when the warlike Orc characters, who boast some of the least expressive character design since the aliens in 'John Carter,' stand next to the film’s human beings,"The Wrap said.

"The heavy use of CGI, and its occasionally awkward interactions with the live-action elements, only serves to distance us even more,"The Guardian wrote. "Much processing power has been put in the service of spectacular, bludgeoning combat, but the images are somehow insubstantial, and we rarely feel the heat of the battle."



The acting isn't any better.

Stars including Dominic Cooper, Ben Foster, Paula Patton, and Travis Fimmel (as the lead, Anduin Lothar) all seem to be victims of miscasting.

"Travis Fimmel is a walking charisma void as strapping warrior Anduin, a sort of Aragorn without the personal charm,"Time Out London wrote.

The Playlist felt that the characters, like Cooper as the King, were "stiff" and that "their accoutrements are so overly polished they appear phony and cheap."



Some critics are comparing it to one of the worst movies ever made.

It's never good when a movie is compared to "Battlefield Earth," a sci-fi bust starring John Travolta and adapted from a novel written by Scientology creator L. Ron Hubbard.

"Imagine 'Battlefield Earth' without the verve, or the unintentional comedy, and you’ve got 'Warcraft,'"The Wrap said.

That stings. But then there's Indiewire's review, which calls the film the "'Battlefield Earth' of the 21st century."

"'Warcraft' is a once-in-a-generation disaster, one of the most ill-advised and ill-conceived studio films of this modern blockbuster era," the site said.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

How intensely violent movies are getting around the R rating

$
0
0

joker suicide squad trailer

It’s rare that a summer blockbuster can earn headlines just from being granted a PG-13 rating, but this week, as the supervillain-stuffed "Suicide Squad" came before the MPAA and walked away without a more restrictive R, pop culture sites reported breathlessly on the development. “'Suicide Squad' Not Too Dark and Twisted for PG-13 Rating” wrote Slashfilm, while CNet deemed the rating “a softer kind of edgy.” Some fans feared a PG-13 meant the film’s violent scenes and highly touted bad attitude would be watered down and took their crusade to director David Ayer, who most recently directed the war film "Fury."“Disappointed that 'Suicide Squad' got a PG-13 rating,” tweeted one. “Your movies are at their best with the freedoms under an R rating.”

My hunch is that they’ll see little difference. Especially this summer, the PG-13 rating means less than it ever has when it comes to brutal, sustained violence.

A few weeks ago, we got the PG-13-rated "X-Men: Apocalypse," where the image of Jennifer Lawrence in a chokehold was offered as marketing and enticement. That was just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to how cavalier the film’s depiction of violence is: By far the most gruesome installment of the main "X-Men" franchise, it features startling decapitations, a graphic shot of bones being pushed through bare skin, and so many slit throats you’d think the movie got some sort of morbid tax break for them. By the time Wolverine shows up for a cameo to gore more anonymous guards with his claws, I started to wonder if this was one of the stabbiest PG-13 films ever made.

Then I saw this week’s "Warcraft." This humans vs. orcs fantasy film rarely goes more than ten minutes without someone gruesomely driving a sword through someone else's chest, and plenty of computer-generated blood “splashes” on the camera for emphasis. In one notably violent confrontation, our hero slides underneath a villain sword-first, tearing him from tip to taint. As we watch the baddie stumble and die in the foreground, the good guy plunges a sword through his back to complete the kill, shoving it through his adversary’s heart until it breaks through the front of his chest, the tip of his blade practically scraping the camera. Kids will love it in 3-D, I guess.

If you have even a passing interest in movies, it won’t come as news to you that the MPAA’s rating system is broken. Ten years ago, documentarian Kirby Dick took on the ratings board with "This Film Is Not Yet Rated," where he decried the sometimes arbitrary, often confounding methods the board would use to hand in its ratings. Two to three uses of the F-word would ensure that a film received an R-rating, while a PG-13 movie could contain ten times as many murders: That's how a movie like "Spotlight" can be rated R even as hyper-violent summer movies slide by with a PG-13. But were "Spotlight’s" scattered curse words and carefully presented discussions of sexual abuse really more damaging than a series of "X-Men" eviscerations? It makes me wonder if even "Deadpool" could have gotten away with a PG-13 if its antihero had just chosen his words more carefully; certainly, that film’s cartoonish violence is no more egregious than the mass-market movies serving up stabbed chests on the regular.

Of course, "Deadpool" would have also had to snip a few seconds from its sex montage, because while the MPAA has become incredibly permissive when it comes to violence in film, they've grown ever more restrictive over the last decade when it comes to sex. It was bad enough when Dick made his documentary 10 years ago and filmmakers described the hoops they'd jump through to make their sexual content palatable for the MPAA — a few too many thrusts and even a totally clothed sex scene could zoom from PG-13 to NC-17 — but it's even more hypocritical now, as screen violence gets more extreme.

While it’s tempting to say that all of us, including the MPAA, have just become more callous to cinematic brutality in an era where first-person shooters and shows like "The Walking Dead" push the envelope in terms of what can they depict onscreen, the ratings board remains stubbornly unrealistic about sex, regularly slapping an R on mildly provocative movies despite the far more intense sexual encounters that can easily be seen on cable TV and, oh, the internet. If a woman expresses sexual pleasure onscreen, the movie must be restricted, but if she stabs someone in the neck, it’s fit for families.

So don't worry, comic-book fans, you have nothing to fear. Warner Bros. will presumably someday market an R-rated cut of "Suicide Squad" in an attempt to squeeze a few more ancillary dollars out of the movie. In the meantime, I’m sure the PG-13 version will do harm just fine.

SEE ALSO: 'Suicide Squad' is getting an expensive reshoot — here's why

DON'T MISS: Margot Robbie has her own Harley Quinn spin-off movie in the works after 'Suicide Squad'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: These are America's 2 most hated fast-food restaurants

Here are the movies and shows inspired by the original 'Indiana Jones'

$
0
0

Indiana Jones, Raiders

June 12th marks the 35th anniversary of "Raiders of the Lost Ark," that great landmark of modern cinema directed by Steven Spielberg from a story by George Lucas. A tribute to the adventure serials of the 1930s and 1940s, "Raiders of the Lost Ark" was greatly influenced by what had come before in blockbuster move cinema and would go on to influence action adventure film and TV that would come after.

We could spend an entire book outlining the ways in which the "Indiana Jones" franchise not only changed action cinema, but continues to influence contemporary pop culture to this day. Instead, let's honor the film's 35th anniversary by looking at how "Raiders of the Lost Ark" has specifically influenced three of the most important TV and film franchises of the last decade: "Captain America," "The X-Files," and "The X-Men"...

Captain America Indiana Jones

Captain America: The First Avenger

Has there even been a more successful "Indiana Jones"-style blockbuster (that isn't "Indiana Jones") than "Captain America: The First Avenger?" Like 'Raiders of the Lost Ark," "The First Avenger" lives and breathes nostalgia. They're both period dramasfeaturing action heroes who fight the Nazis. They even have nearly identical-dressed secondary antagonists in Toby Jones' Dr. Arnim Zola and Ronald Lacey's Major Arnold Ernst Toht.

Of course, these similarities aren't a coincidence. "The First Avenger" director Joe Johnston spoke to the L.A. Times about the extent to which "Indiana Jones" influenced "The First Avenger," saying:

We used 'Raiders' as a template when we were developing the story, but we sort of moved away from it as time went on. This is futurism in the 1940s. If you went to 1942 and thought of what the future would be, that’s what the approach was ... So we went away from the 'Raiders' template in that sense but where we sort of stuck with it was in the structure and the action and the way the main characters are thrown into these situations and then have to get themselves out of them.

When you sit down to watch it, it’s certainly not 'Raiders of the Lost Ark,' which is a very different kind of film in the final analysis. But sometimes when we had questions and we were stuck we would say, ‘What would Indiana Jones do? What would be the answer to this in 'Raiders of the Lost Ark?’ I’ve always loved 'Raiders,' and the great achievement of it was the tone and the fresh feeling of the movie. It was period but didn’t feel like it was made in the period. It felt like a contemporary film about this period in the past, and that is the goal we have with 'Captain America.' And I can say this — it definitely has an 'Indiana Jones' pace.

Though this "Indiana Jones" vibe lessens after Steve Rogers travels to the present-day, "Raiders'" influence lives on in Steve's old-fashioned sensibility. And, though subsequent Captain America films have arguably been better than "The First Avenger," it's hard to imagine what the MCU would look like if that first Captain America installment hadn't worked. "The First Avenger" not only gave us another superhero to match Iron Man within the MCU, but also cemented the tactic of using different genres to craft unique tones for each of the Marvel superheroes within the larger shared cinematic universe.

Indiana Jones Fox Mulder

The X-Files

"The X-Files" may be in its own reboot/revival phase, but that doesn't mean it hasn't been and doesn't continue to be both a) influenced by "Indiana Jones" and b) a bigpart of the cultural zeitgeist. "The X-Files" creator Chris Carter has called "Indiana Jones" one of the reasons why he wanted to go into filmmaking, telling TV Insider:

Sometimes writers—and even people who are not writers—come up and say, I’m doing what I’m doing because of 'The X-Files.' But I could say that about 'Apocalypse Now' for me. Or 'Indiana Jones.' That’s the reason I’m doing what I’m doing.

If "Raiders of the Lost Ark's" influence on "The X-Files" in particular wasn't apparent from Harrison Ford's David Duchovny-like mumbling and masculine earnestness, then the final shot would hammer it home. The film ends with a crate containing the Ark of the Covenant being moved through a government warehouse filled with countless non-descript crates holding other potentially dangerous mysteries. It's a scene that wouldn't be out of place at the end of an episode of "The X-Files."

Agent Fox Mulder is somethng of an Indiana Jones-like character. He has a rugged academicness to him. He is unhealthily passionate about his work. And, like Indy, he is perpetually getting in over his head as the result of his insatiable curiosity about the secrets of the universe (in Indy's case, archaelogy, in Mulder's case, anything unexplained).

Season 6's "Triangle" in particular seems a direct tribute to "Indiana Jones'" swashbuckling style. In the episode, Mulder travels back in time while in the Bermuda Triangle and is rescued by a World War II-era ship overrun by Nazis. He meets someone who looks exactly like Scully, his very own Marion Ravenwood, ready to call him out on his shit and punch Nazis (or him) in the face when the situation calls for it.

Moira MacTaggert

X-Men: Apocalypse

Though "Apocalypse" is set in the 1983 while "Raiders of the Lost Ark" is set in 1936, it seems worth noting that "Apocalypse's" setting is almost the same year as the year "Raiders" was made and the "Indiana Jones" film was obviously an influence on Bryan Singer in the making of "Apocalypse." Singer even shared this photo from the set. Note the caption:

This takes me back to #raidersofthelostark #notallgreenscreen #xmen #xmenapocalypse

A photo posted by Bryan Singer (@bryanjaysinger) on Jul 27, 2015 at 10:08am PDT on

"Apocalypse's" beginning unfolds in a "Raiders"-like fashion, with Moira MacTaggert playing an Indiana Jones of sorts in the first act, traveling to Egypt where she accidentally stumbles upon the hidden tomb of Apocalypse as a cult is just about to resurrect him. (As in "First Class," she is nothing if not timely in her investigating.) 

Den of Geek's David Crow wrote recently about the trend for superhero flicks to "go biblical." Referencing "X-Men: Apocalypse" in his analysis, he writes: "Director Bryan Singer would appear on the surface to be offering a critique of the Christian and Jewish God’s angrier early years ... Like the Old Testament God, Apocalypse is depicted as a vengeful, jealous deity."

It's easy to see "Indiana Jones" in the focus on ancient Egypt and the archaeological-like investigations of Moira, but, in many ways, "Apocalypse's" true homage to "Raiders of the Lost Ark" is in its status as a period drama that blurs the line between the supernatural and the religious. Apocalypse is a vengeful, all-powerful entity, albeit one more corporeal than God as depicted in "Raiders of the Lost Ark."

Perhaps this is where "Apocalypse" gets into trouble. The elements of "Apocalypse" that seem most actively inspired by "Raiders of the Lost Ark" are the very elements that confuse the themes of this film, and distract from much of what was good about the first two "X-Men" prequels: namely, the core relationship between Charles and Erik, and the exploration of the political subtext inherent in the X-Men story.

Still, I would argue that "X-Men: Apocalypse" manages to capture some of the glorious stakes of the "Raiders of the Lost Ark" in its initial introduction of the Apocalypse plot. It's only when it tries to expand upon those elements that the plot starts getting murky. Maybe they should have just had everyone's face melt off instead. 

SEE ALSO: A new 'Indiana Jones' movie with Harrison Ford is coming in 2019

DON'T MISS: Fans are coming up with hilarious fake titles for the next 'Indiana Jones' movie

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Scientifically proven features men find attractive in women

'The Conjuring 2' levels disappointing 'Warcraft' at the box office

$
0
0

Warcraft Universal

The good news for the movie business this weekend was that a sequel did better than projected at the box office after weeks of them earning less than the originals ("Alice Through The Looking Glass,""Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows").

The bad news: The $160 million "Warcraft" crashed and burned.

"The Conjuring 2" took in an estimated $40.3 million to win the weekend at the domestic box office, according to Exhibitor Relations. Coming in second was "Warcraft" with a dismal $24 million on 3,400 screens.

The summer blockbusters are struggling at the box office this year and "Warcraft," based on the popular video game, is the latest example. However, the movie has earned over $280 million already overseas, showing that audiences abroad who are fans of the game came out in droves.

However, "The Conjuring 2" proved that sequels are not completely being ignored this summer. The beefy opening (for a horror) is just below the $41.8 million the original had its opening weekend in 2013 (the second largest all-time opening weekend for a horror).

In third was "Now You See Me 2" with around $23 million, which didn't slip much from the illusion-heavy original that opened with $29.3 million in 2013.

So talk of audiences being burnt out from sequels might have been a little premature.

Another sequel will definitely take the box office next weekend, as the much-anticipated Pixar movie "Finding Dory" opens and is projected to earn some major coin.

SEE ALSO: The 12 worst video games of all time

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 4 things you might have missed on this week’s 'Game of Thrones'

The first trailer for the new Disney movie 'Moana' was just released — and it looks great

$
0
0

moana

The first trailer for "Moana," Disney's latest animated movie, just debuted.

In the latest addition to the Disney princess canon, Moana (Aul i'i Cravalho) sets sail for a fabled island. Joining her on the adventure is the demi-god Maui (Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson). Notably, Lin-Manuel Miranda, the creator and star of "Hamilton," wrote some original music for the movie. His "Hamilton" co-star Phillipa Soo also stars in a still unnamed role.

"Moana" was made by Walt Disney Animation Studios. They hope to follow up on the huge success of both "Frozen" and "Zootopia."

"Moana" will be out in theaters on November 23, 2016. Watch the first trailer below:

 

SEE ALSO: 'Hamilton' creator Lin-Manuel Miranda paid tribute to the Orlando shooting victims with a touching speech

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 4 things you might have missed on this week’s ‘Game of Thrones’

Here are the movie sequels that have bombed at the box office in 2016

$
0
0

Now You See Me 2

"Now You See Me 2" couldn't muster up the surprise success of its predecessor.

The sequel to the 2013 heist film earned $23 million in its opening weekend, while its original managed a better $29.3 million. That's not a huge difference, but it will be a disappointment to the studio executives who hoped to cash in on love for the first title.

"The Conjuring 2" actually came in first place at the box office this weekend, earning $40.3 million — only 3.6% less than its original.

But most sequels, at least so far this year, have been bombing.

There has long been talk of Hollywood having a "sequel problem"— "sequelitis" as Variety calls it.

There are many to choose from at the theater nowadays. Do you want to watch the latest installment in an ongoing superhero franchise? (Take your pick between "Captain America: Civil War,""Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice," or "X-Men: Apocalypse.") Or a live-action remake of an old cartoon? (It's a lose-lose with "Alice Through the Looking Glass" and "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows.")

Studios are trying to build the next big Harry Potter or Marvel franchise, but not every film can be "Captain America," which has seen a steady increase in its domestic gross since the first time Chris Evans' Cap graced our screens in 2011.

Take a look to see which of this year's sequels so far couldn't live up to their originals. Really, it seems only "Captain America: Civil War" managed to escape this list. But don't worry, you still have "Independence Day: Resurgence,""Ice Age: Collision Course,""Jason Bourne,""Star Trek Beyond,""The Purge: Election Year,""Bridget Jones's Baby,""Jack Reacher: Never Go Back," "Ouija 2,""Underworld: Blood Wars," and "Bad Santa 2" to look forward to this year.

All earnings have been adjusted for inflation to match their 2016 counterparts and are sourced from Box Office Mojo. Sequels that are still in theaters have been compared based on opening-weekend grosses.

SEE ALSO: 'Warcraft' is the worst-reviewed blockbuster of the summer so far — here's why

"Kung Fu Panda 3"

"Kung Fu Panda" gross: $257 million

"Kung Fu Panda 2" gross: $176 million

"Kung Fu Panda 3" gross: $143 million

Time hasn't been a gift to the "Kung Fu Panda" franchise. The franchise's third installment dropped 44% in grosses from the original.



"Ride Along 2"

"Ride Along" gross: $145.3 million

"Ride Along 2" gross: $90.8 million

The Ice Cube-Kevin Hart comedy opened big in 2014 but saw its grosses drop 37.5% with its 2016 sequel.



"Zoolander 2"

"Zoolander" gross: $68.4 million

"Zoolander 2" gross: $28.8 million

Though a quotable classic, the original "Zoolander" never seemed to truly shine at the box office. That was even more true for the sequel, which dropped 57.9% in grosses.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

These 6 movie studios have brought in the most cash so far this year (DIS, FOXA, TWC, CMCSA, PGRE, SNE)

$
0
0

Summer

Summer movies have always represented a good opportunity for the movie studios. Many of them chose to release their big "blockbusters" to capture those movie goers trying to escape the summer heat.

2015 saw recording breaking movies like "Jurassic World" and "Avengers: Age of Ultron" released in the summer. None from 2016 have beat the records of last year yet, but summer is still only just beginning.

Most of the major studios have already begun releasing their slate of summer hopefuls, which means the winners and losers of the summer are already starting to emerge.

Read below to find out which studios have brought in the most at the box office this year...

All box office numbers below are provided by Box Office Mojo

#6 Sony (Ticker: SNE)

The biggest movie for Sony Picture Studios this summer has been "The Angry Birds Movie." The film hasn't quite hit the $100 million mark yet, but is on track to do so with $98.2 million in domestic grosses since its release.

The other summer movie from Sony, "Money Monster", received a 56% on Rotten Tomatoes and has brought in $39 million domestically. This puts the movie towards the bottom of the summer box office.

Sony shares have risen 6.8% in 2016.



#5 Paramount (Ticker: VIA)

The heroes in a half shell are back this summer in "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows."

The movie opened June 3, and has not fared as well as its predecessor"Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles" which was released in 2014. The sequel has brought in $61 million domestically in its first two weeks.

The other movies for Paramount's summer haven't been huge hits. "10 Cloverfield Lane" is the best performing movie that has been released from the studio this year, and has brought in $72 million so far.

Still coming for the studio this summer, "Star Trek Beyond."

Viacom, Paramount's parent company, is up 13.7% this year.



#4 Universal (Ticker: CMCSA)

Over-the-top comedy is the strategy for Universal this summer.

"Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising" and "Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping", are the two summer movies from Universal that have already been released. The movies have brought in $53.1 million and $8.3 million respectively.

Looking at all of 2016 bolsters the studio's lineup with several other comedy titles. "Ride Along 2", "The Boss" and "My Big Fat Greek Wedding 2" all were released earlier this year.

So far, none of the titles have been a break out hit, but "The Secret Life of Pets" and the new "Jason Bourne" are set to release later this summer.

Universal is owned by Comcast, which is up 12.9% this year.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

REVIEW: 'Finding Dory' lacks the magic of the original, but it's still a lot of fun

$
0
0

finding dory disney pixar final

Warning: mild spoilers for "Finding Dory" below.

It's been 13 years since Pixar introduced us to Marlin, his son Nemo, and their absent-minded friend Dory in "Finding Nemo," an animated hit that felt like it took over the world when it came out. And finally director Andrew Stanton (also of "Wall-E") has given us a sequel. 

"Finding Dory" takes us back to the bottom of the ocean a year after Marlin (Albert Brooks) went on his adventure to find Nemo and gained a friend in Dory (Ellen DeGeneres). But this time the focus shifts to Dory, who even though she suffers from memory loss has flashes of the past, which have made her realize she has parents and lost them years ago.

Pixar, like the Disney of the old days, is never shy to pull the heartstrings, and this movie is no different. Flashbacks of an adorably wide-eyed baby Dory with her parents (Eugene Levy and Diane Keaton) struggling to hold onto her memories, and eventually alone in the open water with no clue of her parents' whereabouts, are heartbreaking.

But these memories serve a purpose: motivating Dory to seek out her parents. With the area where she once lived fresh in her mind, she, along with Marlin and Nemo, sets out to find her family.

The movie is slow out of the starting gate, but finally takes off after the trio arrives at the Marine Life Institute in California and begins to interact with the sea life there. The appearance of ill-tempered octopus Hank (Ed O'Neill) is a triumph of not just CGI animation, but a well-written character who is the polar opposite of the babbling Dory.

finding doryAs Dory is split from Marlin and Nemo, we move back and forth from Dory's search for her parents and the clownfish searching for Dory. Funny predicaments occur to both until finally they meet back toward the end, just in time for a satisfying finale.

"Finding Dory" certainly doesn't break any new ground in terms of story or subjects tackled. And it certainly doesn't have the magic of "Finding Nemo," which hit a home run with every plot point and character.

There's still a lot to enjoy about "Finding Dory"— the near-sighted whale shark Destiny (Kaitlin Olson) and beluga whale Bailey (Ty Burrell) are hysterically fun, and the recurring joke of a celebrity as the voice of the institute never gets old — but the overcoming of all odds and fears that made us love "Nemo" doesn't have the same punch in "Dory."

Still, it's great to see the gang back together.

"Finding Dory" opens on Friday in theaters.

SEE ALSO: RANKED: Every Pixar movie from worst to best

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Sacha Baron Cohen recounts his 2003 Trump interview: 'I was the first person actually to realize that he’s a d---'

HOLLYWOOD LOVES GUNS: Here's the staggering number of recent movie posters featuring guns

$
0
0

Liam Neeson

Mass shootings haven't curbed Hollywood's habit of putting guns front and center in its movies.

Since a gunman went on a rampage at the Virginia Tech campus in 2007, The New York Times reports that there have been 25 other mass shootings in the country, including the massacre at a gay nightclub in Orlando on Sunday.

Even with the tragedies and public outcries for gun control, Hollywood continues to plaster images of guns on its advertisements.

It seems like Liam Neeson can't be in a movie poster without one — even "A Million Ways to Die in the West" followed the lead of his "Taken" films.

Action stars like Neeson, Matt Damon, and Mark Wahlberg aren't the only ones holding guns. Weapons are also routinely used in comedies' posters. (See: Kevin Hart in "Ride Along 2" or his upcoming film "Central Intelligence" with The Rock, or Channing Tatum and Jonah Hill in "21 Jump Street" and its sequel "22 Jump Street.")

"Jason Bourne,""Cell," and "War Dogs" are all due out this summer and prominently feature guns in their posters.

The amount of film posters featuring guns is startling, and that's not even accounting for the ones that display science-fiction weapons and blasters that resemble guns. Of movie posters from the top 100 domestic grossing movies in 2015 alone, 18 featured guns, or just under a fifth of posters.

Scroll through our slideshow below for 56 posters prominently featuring guns for some of the top grossing movies that have been released since the Virginia Tech shooting in 2007.

SEE ALSO: HOLLYWOOD'S BIG PROBLEM: Here are the sequels that are bombing this year

"Transporter 3" (2008)



"Quantum of Solace" (2008)

Daniel Craig's James Bond hasn't stopped carrying guns since 2008. Check out the posters for "Skyfall" and for "Spectre."



"Max Payne" (2008)



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

5 things you didn't know about the crazy twist ending of '10 Cloverfield Lane'

$
0
0

10 Cloverfield Lane paramount

One of the surprise hits of 2016 has been "10 Cloverfield Lane," the "spiritual sequel" to the 2008 found-footage movie "Cloverfield," which followed a group of New Yorkers during an alien attack.

In "Lane," producer J.J. Abrams (also behind the original) and director Daniel Trachtenberg create a story that has the feel of a thrilling sci-fi movie, but for different reasons than "Cloverfield." 

In this story, we follow Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) after she has been in a car accident. She's now in an underground bunker being taken care of by Howard (John Goodman), who informs her that an attack has happened on the planet and that the air outside is no longer breathable.

This leads to a trippy series of mind games and thrills that suggest, as the movie's tagline says, "Monsters come in many forms."

For the movie's Blu-ray/DVD/Digital HD release on Tuesday, Business Insider talked to Trachtenberg about the evolution of its thrilling ending. 

Warning: spoilers for the ending of "10 Cloverfield Lane" below.

SEE ALSO: Netflix says there are 3 kinds of binge-watchers — find out which one you are

1. The ending was originally less hopeful.

Before Trachtenberg came on to direct the movie, the spec script was titled “The Cellar” and concluded with Michelle escaping the bunker, realizing the air is fine, and traveling to Chicago. There it's revealed that the city is in rubble.

“I never read the spec script but from what I’ve been told, it’s like the city is on fire or something,” Trachtenberg said. “But the first script I read, there was an alien attack and she still had to do more to survive.”



2. At one time, the ending was set in the daytime and there were more aliens Michelle had to fight.

When J.J. Abrams’ Bad Robot production company bought the script and attached Trachtenberg to direct, they began making tweaks to “The Cellar” script. For a while, the ending was set during the day, and there were a few other differences from what we see in the final cut.

“Actually a couple of creatures [attack Michelle], not just one. She sees a creature in the distance as opposed to seeing a ship, little changes like that.”

The scene was changed to night to build up the scares, but taking out the second alien wasn’t from the brain trust of Abrams, Trachtenberg, and their team...



3. Here's how the film's one test screening changed the ending.

Michelle's confrontation with two aliens was shown to the only test-screening audience for the film. The biggest takeaway was that people could only take so much.

“The ending we shot was longer,” Trachtenberg said. “It had an extra creature attack in it and the test audience said it was too much. They were exhausted. So that was the main impact that the test audience had on it.”



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Are movies getting longer? Here's the data

$
0
0

captain america civil war

Are movies getting longer? The year's biggest blockbusters, "Batman v Superman,""X-Men: Apocalypse," were both over 145 miutes long, and severalcritics took issue with the 146 minute runtime in the otherwise excellently reviewed, "Captain America: Civil War." 

Dr. Randal Olson, an expert on data visualization, posted original research to his site based on IMDB's film database. Surprisingly, he found that the data supports the opposite: overall movie length isn't actually growing.

Here's what he found:

Dr. Olson compiled the runtimes from the 25 most popular movies each year from 1931 to 2013. Take a look:

average feature film length over centuryThe data reveals two major shifts in movie length. First: from 1950 to 1965, average runtime for top films rapidly increased, gaining about 20 minutes on average. Dr. Olson hypothesizes that competition from television pressured movie studios to produce longer epics that would bring people to theaters. Classic epics like "Ten Commandments" (1956, 220 mins), and "Lawrence of Arabia" (1962, 216 mins) were released in this time period. 

This upward trend reversed between the 1965 and 1985. During this period, movies lost about ten minutes in runtime. In his post, Dr. Olson points to the rise of home video. There's no definitive answer, but it's entirely possible that studios wanted to keep movies under two hours so they could easily fit on VHS tapes. 

These two shifts are important because they help explain why we tend to think movies are getting longer.

"Between 1985-2000, feature films grew back to the same length as in the 1960s," Dr. Olson explains. "This may explain why it’s usually Millennials (born 1980-2000) complaining that movies have gotten longer than they used to be: If you grew up watching movies in the 1980s, they have gotten longer for you! Meanwhile, Generation X-ers are shaking their head at Millennials wondering what the heck they’re talking about (as usual)."

Movies aren't arbitrarily getting longer so much as they're returning to a status quo set in 1965.

Notable exceptions are films competing for Academy Awards. Speaking with The Daily Beast, Rolling Stone film critic Peter Travers said studios are afraid movies with runtimes under two hours won't be taken seriously come Oscar season. “Hollywood studios believe movies are weighed by the pound when it comes to Academy thinking. If it ain’t long, it ain’t winning," Travers said. 

The chart below looks at all films in the IMDB database (excluding Bollywood) between 1906 and 2013. 

xavg feature film lengthDr. Olson found that, as a whole, movies aren't anywhere near as long as the two-hour plus standard seen in best picture contenders. Of the ten films nominated for best picture in 2016, eight were over two hours long. And even the longest movies don't approach the runtime of classical epics before 1965. 

For reference, here's a look at the length of the ten best picture nominees for 2016:

"The Big Short" - 130 mins
"Bridge of Spies" - 142 mins
"Brooklyn" - 112 mins
"Mad Max: Fury Road" - 120 mins
"The Martian" - 144 mins
"The Revenant" - 156 mins
"Room" - 118 mins
"Spotlight" - 129 mins

Overall, it seems, big budget epics will keep you in the theater the longest, though your standard popcorn movies will probably be less of a drain on your time. And as long as studios equate runtime with critical acclaim, that isn't likely to change. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How to find Netflix’s secret categories

Viewing all 8368 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images