Channel: Movies

'Cruella' stars Emma Stone as the infamous Disney villain — here's how to watch on Disney Plus the same day it debuts in theaters


disney cruella emma stone 1

Summary List PlacementMonthly Subscription Service (small)

Disney's latest live-action film, "Cruella," will offer a fresh take on one of the studio's most infamous animated villains. The film focuses on Cruella de Vil from the "101 Dalmatians" franchise and tells the story of how she became the character audiences have come to know on screen. 

"Cruella," starring Oscar-winning actress Emma Stone, will arrive in theaters and on Disney Plus on May 28 via Premier Access. Premier Access requires subscribers to pay an extra $30 one-time fee in order to watch a movie at home while it's still playing on the big screen.  

The film is set in 1970s London and follows a young woman, Estella (Emma Stone), whose "flair for fashion" earns the attention of Baroness von Hellman, according to the film's official synopsis. But the relationship between the two spurs Estella to "embrace her wicked side" and become the "raucous, fashionable, and revenge-bent" Cruella de Vil.

How to watch 'Cruella' on Disney Plus

"Cruella" will arrive on Disney Plus as a Premier Access title on May 28. Disney Plus subscribers will have to pay a one-time $30 fee to unlock the film on that date.

As long as you remain a Disney Plus member, you'll be able to stream the movie whenever you want. The film is expected to become available to all Disney Plus subscribers, without the extra fee, at a later date. Previous Premier Access windows have lasted three months, but Disney has yet to confirm if that will be the case for "Cruella."

Disney Plus costs $8 a month or $80 a year. You can also bundle Disney Plus with ESPN+ and Hulu Basic for $14 a month, a savings of about $6 a month compared to purchasing the three streaming services on their own.

Monthly Subscription Service (small)Bundle Monthly Subscription (small)

You can watch Disney Plus on a number of media players including Chromecast, Fire TV, Apple TV, Roku, and most smart TVs. You can find a full list of devices that support Disney Plus here.

How to watch other '101 Dalmatians' films and shows

In addition to "Cruella," the "101 Dalmatians" franchise includes the original animated film, an animated direct-to-video sequel, two live-action movies, three made-for-TV films, and two TV series. 

All of the below titles are available to watch with a Disney Plus subscription:

You can also order most of these titles through video-on-demand (VOD) streaming providers such as Prime Video, Apple TV, Google Play, and more. 

The '60s animated classic "101 Dalmatians" is available on a number of VOD streaming services. Most platforms will let you rent the film for $4, purchase the film in standard definition (SD) for $15, or purchase the film in high definition (HD) for $20.

Join the conversation about this story »

'Wonder Woman 1984' is back on HBO Max, and you can also buy it from Amazon, Vudu, and other VOD streaming services


wonder woman 1984 warner bros

Summary List PlacementMax (small)

"Wonder Woman 1984" is back on HBO Max, the same streaming service it premiered on in December 2020. The movie was the first in a series of Warner Bros. films made available for streaming the same day they hit the big screen.

Director Patty Jenkins and stars Gal Gadot and Chris Pine return for "Wonder Woman 1984." The action picks up 40 years after the conclusion of 2017's "Wonder Woman." Kristen Wiig plays Cheetah, a villain who can match Wonder Woman's superhuman abilities, and "The Mandalorian" star Pedro Pascal plays nefarious businessman Maxwell Lord.

HBO Max subscribers were given one month of exclusive access before "Wonder Woman 1984" was removed from the service and made available to buy from other providers, like Amazon, Vudu, and Google Play. "Wonder Woman 1984" was added back to the HBO Max library in May 2021 alongside other DC films like "Zack Snyder's Justice League" and "Batman v Superman."

Warner's decision to debut its theatrical releases on HBO Max has already helped bring millions of new subscribers to the streaming service, and could influence other studios to pursue a similar course. Data from research startup Antenna showed that HBO Max signups increased 4.3 times during the weekend "Wonder Woman 1984" premiered.

How to watch 'Wonder Woman 1984'

"Wonder Woman 1984" is currently available to all HBO Max subscribers; the streaming service costs $15 a month for commercial-free access to its library. A $10/month ad-supported plan will launch in June.

Max (small)

"Wonder Woman 1984" is also available to buy through video-on-demand (VOD) services, including Amazon, Vudu, FandangoNow, Microsoft, Google Play, and Apple TV. The movie costs $20 to own, and it's offered in up to 4K Ultra HD quality. A rental option is not currently available. You can access your digital copy via the VOD service you select on various media players and smart TVs

1984 (button)

If you want to purchase a disc copy of the film, the "Wonder Woman 1984" Blu-ray ($22) and 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray ($28) were released on March 30.

Does 'Wonder Woman 1984' support 4K, HDR, and Dolby Atmos?

"Wonder Woman 1984" was the first movie on HBO Max to stream in 4K with support for high dynamic range (HDR). The film is available in HDR10, Dolby Vision, and Dolby Atmos on supported devices, matching the maximum quality typically seen on Netflix and Disney Plus.

The VOD version also offers Dolby Vision, HDR10, and Dolby Atmos playback though streaming services that support those features, including Vudu and Apple TV.

What other Warner Bros. movies are coming to HBO Max?

The next scheduled Warner Bros. release on HBO Max is "The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It," the third entry in the popular horror franchise. Other major releases set to arrive on the streaming service throughout 2021 include "The Matrix 4,""The Suicide Squad,""Space Jam" and more.

HBO Max subscribers can currently stream "Those Who Wish Me Dead."

You can see a full list of upcoming Warner Bros. movies scheduled for day-and-date releases in theaters and on HBO Max here.

Join the conversation about this story »

'Fast and Furious 9' is soaring at the box office in China and easing fears about the future of Hollywood blockbusters in the crucial market


f9 universal

Summary List Placement

The "Fast and Furious" franchise has long been an international hit. And the latest film in the series is off to a strong start, even at a Chinese box office recovering from the pandemic.

"Fast and Furious 9," or simply "F9," earned $162 million internationally over the weekend, with $135 million of that coming from China. It's the first Hollywood movie since 2019's "Avengers: Endgame" to crack $100 million in its opening weekend in China. The movie, which was delayed more than a year, doesn't open in the US until June 25.

The last two entries in the main series, "Furious 7" and "The Fate of the Furious," both grossed more than $1 billion globally and around $390 in China.

"F9's" early success offers fresh relief that big-budget Hollywood tentpoles can still perform well in a region that Hollywood has relied heavily on to boost global box-office numbers in recent years, but where local productions largely dominated during the pandemic.

The pandemic has greatly accelerated China's box-office dominance over the US, which could also have major ramifications. 

China has dethroned the US

The Chinese theater industry experienced an incredible rebound after the region's thousands of theaters shut down for months during the pandemic. Local movies did gangbuster business while Hollywood releases like "Soul" and "Wonder Woman 1984" underwhelmed

Local movies accounted for 85% of China's box office in 2020, up from 60% in 2018, according to the analytics company Comscore. The top 10 grossing movies at the China box office from April 1, 2020 to March 29, 2021 were all locally produced.

Gitesh Pandya, the editor of BoxOfficeGuru.com, noted in April that Hollywood delayed many of its biggest movies, and that the right movie could still sell. 

"There's certainly plenty of hope in Hollywood that China will still be a crucial market," Pandya told Insider at the time.

Since then, "Godzilla vs. Kong" (which has made $183 million there) and now "Fast and Furious 9" have eased some concerns.

But while the US market is showing some signs of life ("Godzilla vs. Kong" is nearing $100 million domestically), China has dethroned the US as the biggest theatrical market in the world. 

The research firm Ampere Analysis had projected China to overtake the US by 2022 before the pandemic. It now expects China to remain at the top indefinitely as the US market slowly springs back. 

Ampere Analysis research director Richard Cooper said that China's theatrical market will continue to expand and ticket sales will rise, along with Chinese revenue for US movies, while the US theatrical market will shrink. 

"The previously stable US market will reduce in size following the pandemic," Cooper said. "This is largely due to a forecast downturn in film financing and the fact that some US cinemas will shutter permanently."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why 'moist' is one of the most hated words in the English language

Why the James Bond franchise could be complicated for Amazon after buying the MGM film studio


no time to die

Summary List Placement

Amazon is expanding its film exploits.

The company announced on Wednesday that it would buy the MGM film studio, whose assets include the James Bond movies, for $8.45 billion. But the rights to the long-running franchise are more complicated than they might initially appear. MGM only owns half of Bond.

The other major players in the background of the Bond franchise are the half-siblings Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson, who oversee the franchise's creative direction and own Eon Productions and its parent company Danjaq LLC.

Danjaq and MGM, which distributes the Bond movies domestically, co-own the copyright to the films. But Broccoli and Wilson are the ones with final say on the direction of the franchise. They inherited the series from Broccoli's father, Albert Broccoli, who cofounded Eon in 1962.

In a rare interview in January 2020, Broccoli told Variety that her and Wilson were the "custodians of this character," referring to Bond.

"We take that responsibility seriously," she said. 

Eon has produced 24 Bond movies, starting with 1962's "Dr. No." The 25th Bond entry, with star Daniel Craig in his final outing as the character, hits theaters in October after a long delay due to the coronavirus pandemic (it was originally scheduled for release in April 2020). Universal is handling international distribution.

Amazon's purchase of MGM comes at a transitional period for the franchise with Craig exiting the role after 15 years and five movies.

The biggest Bond question after the MGM sale is whether Broccoli and Wilson would go along with an expansion of the Bond franchise outside of the main film series, such as a TV spinoff. As long as they're the keepers of the franchise, it won't be as easy as buying MGM for Amazon to capitalize on the prospects of that universe.

In other words, there won't be a Prime Video Bond TV series unless Broccoli and Wilson want it, and they aren't strangers to overruling ideas. The duo once nixed an idea for a "'Smallville'-like television series that would have followed a teenage Bond at Eton," according to Variety.

They haven't entirely ruled out TV, though. Broccoli told Variety that they would be open to expanding the franchise to streaming.

"We make these films for the audiences," Broccoli said. "We like to think that they're going to be seen primarily on the big screen. But having said that, we have to look to the future. Our fans are the ones who dictate how they want to consume their entertainment. I don't think we can rule anything out, because it's the audience that will make those decisions. Not us."

Amazon has placed a big TV bet on another established franchise, "The Lord of the Rings." That will cost $465 million for just one season, including $250 million for the rights, according to The Hollywood Reporter. Perhaps Broccoli and Wilson would be more open to the idea of a prestige Bond series with a movie-level budget, if Amazon is willing to drop such a pretty penny.

Still, Shawn Robbins, the chief analyst at Box Office Pro, reiterated that much of Bond's value comes from the shared theatrical experience. 

Potential complications aside, the Bond franchise is a lucrative one, with $7 billion at the worldwide box office over the 24 Eon-produced films. 2012's "Skyfall" was the first to make more than $1 billion globally and its followup, 2015's "Spectre," earned $880 million.

"As long as Amazon remains committed to the franchise's roots and willing to work with its creative custodians to ensure that particular integrity remains at the series' core, regardless of other storytelling branches the series might take, it should prove to be a highly lucrative relationship," Robbins said. 

He added that the relationship should evolve "as theatrical and streaming releases prove their ability to coexist."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why I'm throwing away every plastic thing in my kitchen ASAP

Where to stream every James Bond movie, as Amazon prepares to buy the studio that releases them


james bond skyfall

Summary List Placement

The James Bond movie franchise has a new home.

Amazon announced on Wednesday it would buy the MGM film studio, which co-owns the copyright to the Bond movies, and finances and distributes them domestically. 

But if audiences think they'll be able to watch the Bond movies on Prime Video, they may have to wait a bit.

The most recent movies starring Daniel Craig are currently scattered across multiple streaming services, like subscription platforms Netflix and Hulu. Most of the pre-Craig films are available on the free, ad-supported services Tubi and Pluto TV (though the movies will be interrupted by ads). They were on Prime Video and Hulu for a limited time last year. 

The only Bond film streaming on Amazon Prime Video right now is 2012's "Skyfall" (it's also on Hulu), but viewers can rent any of the Bond movies on Amazon or any other premium video-on-demand service like iTunes or YouTube.

The good news for Prime members, as Vox's Peter Kafka pointed out on Twitter, is that this could be one reason Amazon was ready to buy MGM now. Kafka noted the studio "isn't weighed down by long-term deals to other distributors." If streaming services had locked up rights to some Bond films long-term, you'd certainly expect a big announcement around it. Because none have made such an announcement, it suggests the streaming windows for the Bond movies could be relatively short at these other services, or non-exclusive.

MGM did not immediately return a request for comment.

But beyond the streaming rights to the movies, the future of the Bond franchise could be complicated for Amazon.

The other half of the Bond ownership is Danjaq LLC, the parent company of Eon Productions. The companies are owned by producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson — who have final say on the direction of the franchise. In other words, a Prime Video Bond TV series won't be happening unless Broccoli and Wilson want it to.

Eon has produced 24 Bond movies, with the 25th, "No Time to Die," hitting theaters in October after a long delay due to the pandemic (Eon did not produce two Bond movies due to rights issues, 1967's parody film "Casino Royale" and 1983's "Never Say Never Again." Both are streaming on Tubi).

Here's where every Bond movie is streaming right now, according to the streaming search engine Reelgood:

  • Tubi and Pluto TV
    • "Dr. No" (1962)
    • "From Russia with Love" (1963)
    • "Goldfinger" (1964)
    • "Thunderball" (1965)
    • "You Only Live Twice" (1967)
    • "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" (1969)
    • "Diamonds Are Forever" (1971)
    • "Live and Let Die" (1973)
    • "The Man with the Golden Gun" (1974)
    • "The Spy Who Loved Me" (1977)
    • "Moonraker" (1979)
    • "Octopussy" (1983)
    • "A View to a Kill" (1985)
    • "The Living Daylights" (1987)
    • "License to Kill" (1989)
    • "Goldeneye" (1995)
    • "Tomorrow Never Dies" (1997)
    • "The World Is Not Enough" (1999)
    • "Die Another Day" (2002)
  • Tubi only (Bond movies not produced by Eon Productions )
    • "Casino Royale" (1967)
    • "Never Say Never Again" (1983) 
  • Netflix 
    • "Casino Royale" (2006)
    • "Quantum of Solace" (2008)
  • Hulu and Prime Video
    • "Skyfall" (2012)
  • Fubo TV
    • "Spectre" (2015)
  • Not streaming
    • "For Your Eyes Only" (1981)

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Sneaky ways Costco gets you to buy more

Amazon's $8.5 billion blockbuster deal with MGM is about to shake up the streaming wars


MGM logo and Bezos

Summary List Placement

Hello! This story is from today's edition of Morning Brew, an awesome daily email publication read by 2.5 million next-generation leaders like you. Sign up here to get it!

After weeks of rumors, Amazon finally laid its goldfinger on MGM in a deal worth $8.5 billion. It's Amazon's second-largest acquisition after Whole Foods and the first time a tech company has bought a major legacy media firm. 

Leo the Lion's roar has a big echo

MGM's iconic mascot reflects the movie studio's blockbuster content catalog—featuring franchises such as Legally BlondeJames BondRocky, and Creed—that could soon port over to Amazon Prime Video.

  • Amazon will get a leg up at the Emmys too, and not just because MGM houses The Handmaid's TaleFargo, and Vikings, but also because it's a studio capable of churning out more prestige TV.

However...while quarantined viewers proved they're willing to sign up for multiple streaming services (Disney+, Discovery+, and Paramount+ all reported impressive growth numbers) they'll all soon compete with social calendars filled with more events than "4:30—Stare into the abyss."

Zoom out: The streaming wars are still heating up, especially when it comes to strategic M&A (earlier this month, AT&T said it'll merge WarnerMedia and Discovery). MGM could make Amazon Prime Video more than the streaming service you forgot you're subscribed to.

This story is from today's edition of Morning Brew, a daily email publication. Sign up here to get it!

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside a $3 million doomsday condo that can sustain 75 people for 5 years

Disney's 'Cruella' marks the company's third PG-13 release this year as the company moves away from G and PG-rated films


cruella emma stone hq 1

Summary List Placement

Hello! This story is from today's edition of Morning Brew, an awesome daily email publication read by 2.5 million next-generation leaders like you. Sign up here to get it!

Today, Disney's live-action "Cruella" arrives in theaters and on Disney+. But if you're looking forward to cute puppies, you might be surprised by this dark origin story of the iconic villain. While the 1996 version of "101 Dalmatians" was rated G, this retelling is rated PG-13.

Nobody wants a G."Cruella" is Disney's third PG-13 release in a year, according to the WSJ. And if family-friendly Disney is leaning into "extended violence and smoking," you know the rest of the industry is trending that direction…and has been for a while. By the 2000s, PG-13 movies were raking in most of the box office revenue. 

  • Between 2010–2019, PG-13 movies grossed $54.6 billion. In the same time span, PG movies earned $24.3 billion; R movies, $26.5 billion; and G movies, $2.7 billion, according to Comscore.

Bottom line: PG-13 has become the sweet spot for Disney to appeal to a broader audience interested in violent Marvel films, live-action remakes of its classics, and new projects like "Hamilton."

This story is from today's edition of Morning Brew, a daily email publication. Sign up here to get it!

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Where you should go to stay safe during an earthquake

The 10 biggest Netflix original movies of all time


army of the dead

Summary List Placement

SEE ALSO: Netflix added 8.5 million paid subscribers in Q4, surpassing 200 million for the first time despite slowed growth following a massive pandemic-driven spike

10. (tied) "Army of the Dead"— 72 million

Description:"After a zombie outbreak in Las Vegas, a group of mercenaries takes the ultimate gamble by venturing into the quarantine zone for the greatest heist ever."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 70%

What critics said: "Snyder understands the tonality of a modern zombie film. Like Dawn of the Dead, it's where his trademark snark shines best."— Polygon

10. (tied) "The Midnight Sky" (2020) — 72 million

Description: "In the aftermath of a global catastrophe, a lone scientist in the Arctic races to contact a crew of astronauts with a warning not to return to Earth."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 50%

What critics said: "The Midnight Sky is a good example of a movie that sells itself short by trying to be one thing — serious, heavy, emotional — when, by all available indicators, it should be more of a thriller, or more ridiculous, or at the very least more fun."— Rolling Stone

8. "Project Power" (2020) — 75 million

Description: "An ex-soldier, a teen and a cop collide in New Orleans as they hunt for the source behind a dangerous new pill that grants users temporary superpowers."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 61%

What critics said: "A film built on the thrill of the now, the hyper-modernity on show in hip-hop trappings, tricks lifted from gaming and yes, the availability of the whole thing at the push of a button in the palm of your hand."— Financial Times

7. "Enola Holmes" (2020) — 76 million

Description: "While searching for her missing mother, intrepid teen Enola Holmes uses her sleuthing skills to outsmart big brother Sherlock and help a runaway lord."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 91%

What critics said: "'Enola Homes' is the kind of movie that the preteen set will surely delight in and watch over and over. I know I would have."— Associated Press

6. "The Old Guard" (2020) — 78 million

Description: "Four undying warriors who've secretly protected humanity for centuries become targeted for their mysterious powers just as they discover a new immortal."

Rotten Tomatoes critics score: 80%

What critics said: "The Old Guard asks some existential questions that leave the audience wanting more."— Vox

5. (tie) "Murder Mystery" (2019) — 83 million

Description: "On a long-awaited trip to Europe, a New York City cop and his hairdresser wife scramble to solve a baffling murder aboard a billionaire's yacht."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 44%

What critics said: "Every Adam Sandler comedy abides by a trope as hoary as 'the butler did it.' At some point in the shenanigans, Sandler's schlub has gotta get a chance to prove he's the bravest boy in the world."— Variety

5. (tie) "6 Underground" (2019) — 83 million

Description: "After faking his death, a tech billionaire recruits a team of international operatives for a bold and bloody mission to take down a brutal dictator."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 36%

What critics said: "This is a terrible action movie that utilizes Michael Bay's worst instincts and none of his best."— Newsday

3. "Spenser Confidential" (2020) — 85 million

Description: "Spenser, an ex-cop and ex-con, teams up with aspiring fighter Hawk to uncover a sinister conspiracy tied to the deaths of two Boston police officers."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 37%

What critics said: "An ending that teases the possibility of sequels, with Wahlberg's Spenser tackling more cases of police officers and emergency personnel who have been falsely accused of crimes, should elicit nothing but groans."— AV Club

2. "Bird Box" (2018) — 89 million

Description: "Five years after an ominous unseen presence drives most of society to suicide, a survivor and her two children make a desperate bid to reach safety."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 63%

What critics said: "Bird Box's pieces feel forcibly screwed together, a movie marionetted by strings of data code. There's good scenes and smart ideas, but overall, the movie mostly clomps."— Guardian

1. "Extraction" (2020) — 99 million

Description: "A hardened mercenary's mission becomes a soul-searching race to survive when he's sent into Bangladesh to rescue a drug lord's kidnapped son."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 67%

What critics said: "The fight scenes are plastic and glossy. Hargrave mistakes gore for cool and technical prowess for choreography, deploying overlong one-take shots that look like 'Call of Duty' outtakes."— New York Times

How 'Saw' became a $1 billion horror franchise after nearly going straight-to-DVD, and what the producers have planned for the future



Summary List Placement

The story of "Saw" has as many twists and turns as the horror franchise itself.

When the first movie, directed by James Wan, was released in 2004, it was a box-office hit, grossing $56 million in the US and $103 million worldwide off of a measly $1.2 million budget.

Seventeen years and eight sequels later, including the recently released "Spiral: From the Book of Saw," the franchise — which is about a serial killer named Jigsaw who sets up elaborate traps for his victims — has hit $1 billion in total global box office. ("Spiral" has grossed $24 million worldwide and is getting an early digital-rental release on June 1.)

It's an impressive feat considering that first entry was almost sentenced to the void of straight-to-DVD movies.

"You don't know how close 'Saw' was to never getting a theatrical release," said producer Mark Burg, cofounder of Twisted Pictures, which has produced every "Saw" movie. 

Burg and Twisted cofounder Oren Koules liken themselves to James Bond producer Barbara Broccoli, in the sense that they've been among the few constants in the nearly two decades of the "Saw" franchise. Like Broccoli with Bond, they are the keepers of "Saw."

The duo, along with other "Saw" insiders, spoke with Insider about how the franchise has sustained itself over the years and what's to come, including a prequel movie, "Spiral" sequel, and maybe TV down the line.

"When you have a concept and a world that is as developed and rich as 'Saw' is, there are endless possibilities," said Jason Constantine, the Lionsgate president of acquisitions and coproductions, who has been involved with "Saw" since the beginning.

chris rock spiral saw

Lionsgate has distributed every movie from 2004's "Saw" to this year's "Spiral," but its devotion to "Saw" got off to a rocky start, according to Burg and Koules.

After an initial research screening of "Saw" just outside of Los Angeles that Burg and Koules said "tested through the roof," Lionsgate set up another test screening in Las Vegas in March 2004. But Lionsgate didn't tell the producing duo exactly where it was until the day of.

"They thought we brought in 200 of our closest friends because they didn't think there was any way it could test so well," Burg said. 

That screening "tested even higher," Constantine said. 

"That was the turning point to realize it could really be a theatrical movie," he said.

"Saw" was ultimately released in the UK that September and made $11 million before it even hit North American theaters on Halloween weekend in October, a weekend the franchise would own for some time after.

"It crushed and gave everybody a lot more bravado about putting the movie in theaters and spending more money" on advertising, Koules said.

Since then, every "Saw" movie except the sixth has grossed more than $100 million globally. The highest budget for a "Saw" movie before "Spiral" (which cost $40 million to produce) was $20 million for the seventh entry. Every other "Saw" cost $11 million or less, not counting marketing costs.

Burg and Koules credit the franchise's main antagonist Jigsaw, played by Tobin Bell, with why audiences keep coming back for more.

"It's a weird dynamic where people cheer and root for Jigsaw, but he's not a vigilante," Koules said.

"We always want to make sure that Jigsaw succeeds when the movie's over," Burg said.

"Yet we're the two idiots that killed him in 'Saw III,'" he added with a bit of self-deprecation.

That clearly didn't stop fans from returning to theaters or scooping up home-video releases. Since 2004, only a handful of horror franchises have hit the coveted $1 billion mark, according to data from the research company Comscore, including "Resident Evil,""It," and "The Conjuring," if we include the spinoffs of the latter. And Koules said that the "Saw" franchise has likely hit closer to $2.5 billion after accounting for home-entertainment sales. 

"Hitting the $1 billion mark in global box office is a huge deal for any franchise, but in the horror genre it's almost elusive," said Paul Dergarabedian, the Comscore senior media analyst. "The 'Saw' franchise clearly struck a chord with audiences around the world."

saw 2004 movie

Sequels and 'Spiral'

Nobody was thinking about sequels to "Saw" in 2004; not Burg and Koules, not Lionsgate, and not even writer/director Wan and his cowriter Leigh Whannell (who also plays Adam in the movie and has since directed thrillers of his own like "Upgrade" and "The Invisible Man").

"I think James and I were thinking more of the first 'Saw' film as a demo reel for our next film than anything," Whannell told AV Club in 2010. "Far from thinking of what should the sequels be about, we thought that we would probably make the film and then be carting that around on a DVD trying to get people to watch it. So we just really didn't think ahead."

As for Burg and Koules: "We just wanted to get our money back," Burg said. 

They did get their money back and then some. The pair struck down several offers from Lionsgate, including $5 million, before settling on a deal where they wouldn't take an advance, but pay Lionsgate a distribution fee of "roughly 18% to 20%" and keep the rest. "Saw" cost just over $1 million to make and it grossed more than $100 million.

"It was more money than I'd every dreamed of in my life," Burg said. 

Despite the film's success, Lionsgate was cautious. Burg and Koules made seven "Saw" movies in seven years, but Lionsgate never greenlit a sequel until after the previous movie was released. They were also producing the sitcom "Two and a Half Men" during those years.

"Some of it is kind of a blur to us," Koules said. 


"I don't think any of us knew when 'Saw II' came out what it would do," said "Spiral" director Darren Lynn Bousman, who also directed "Saw II,""III," and "IV.""It wasn't a franchise at that point. It wasn't until 'Saw II' made money that the intensity started."

"Saw II" made $153 million worldwide off of a $4 million budget, showing that the first film wasn't a fluke.

"You can't have a franchise unless the second movie works," Constantine said. 

While the franchise hit its stride with the early films, it hit a slump with "Saw VI," which underperformed compared to the previous entries with $72 million globally. The next film in 2010 was dubbed "Saw: The Final Chapter"— but turns out, it wasn't. The seventh film got the series back on track with $136 million, but the franchise took a hiatus until the eighth movie, "Jigsaw," in 2017.

After "Jigsaw," the producing duo were developing a "Saw" prequel of sorts with Bell, the Jigsaw actor, when Chris Rock pitched his idea for what would become "Spiral."

"With the first movie we tried doing a a lot more psychological horror, like 'Seven,'" Koules said. "As the movies went on they got a lot more rough. Then Chris came along and said he wants to do '48 Hours' meets 'Seven.' We were really excited because we wanted to get back to the psychological aspect."

Rock's pitch was intriguing enough to lure Bousman back to direct. 

"'Spiral' was a completely different beast for me," he told Insider. "It's been 14 years since I made a 'Saw' movie. My hope was that we would do something that was unique. With people like Chris and [Samuel L.] Jackson attached, we didn't want to just rehash the same movie."

"Spiral" has topped both weekends at the domestic box office it's been in theaters, but the pandemic has held it back.

"The pandemic forced every distributor to think about multiple options for every movie on their release slate," Constantine, the Lionsgate exec, said. "We wanted the opportunity for Spiral to be in theaters for an exclusive amount of time, but we're also still living in a period of time where some aren't vaccinated or not ready to go to a theater or their local theater isn't at full capacity."

The movie finally arrived exclusively in theaters on May 14 after a year-long delay and has earned $17 million domestically. The movie will hit premium video-on-demand services on June 1, much earlier than anticipated. It will debut on Lionsgate's streaming service Starz in October.

"From a financial standpoint, it's been nerve-wracking," Bousman said. "It's one of the first movies to usher people back. It's been surreal."

He added: "I don't think the success of 'Spiral' will be apparent until after it's out in the home ... Going to a theater is almost a religious experience for me. It's cathartic, especially after the last year. That said, over the last decade, home entertainment has gotten so much better. People are now more comfortable [watching movies] in their own homes."

Koules and Burg said they are proponents of the theatrical experience, but are happy that more viewers who may not be comfortable returning to a theater will now be able to see the movie. 

"We're grateful for the people coming out for 'Spiral' but if certain people aren't comfortable and want to watch it at home, that's great," Koules said.

tobin bell as jigsaw saw movies

'Saw' isn't over

Just because "Spiral" is finally out in the world doesn't mean Burg and Koules have stopped thinking about the future of the franchise.

They still plan to make that "prequel," which they described as a Jigsaw origin story that would be set "somewhere in the early 'Saw' movies where Jigsaw is still alive," after the first film but before the third. 

"We don't want to say too much about it because ultimately we may do another 'Spiral' before that movie," Burg said. "That decision will get made when we sit down with Lionsgate [this summer] and ask the best way to satisfy our fanbase."

They expect that both movies will eventually get made (though Lionsgate has yet to officially greenlight anything). But is "Saw" a strictly cinematic experience? Maybe not quite. The producers are open to exploring TV.

"We've talked about for at least the last 10 years doing TV," Koules said. "I think the evolution of TV has got us thinking. If we could figure out a way to do a great show, it's something we would do and that would be something else from the 'Book of Saw.' We'll probably do an OG 'Saw' or another 'Spiral' and then talk about TV."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How the 1999 Russian apartment bombings led to Putin's rise to power

Hate going to the theater? Here's how theaters are ruining the movie-going experience

Summary List Placement

Following is a transcript of the video.

Narrator: Which looks better? This, or that? Well, what if I told you that you may have been paying a premium to see the worst version.

You know those black bars you sometimes see on the top, bottom or sides of a movie? They occur because movies are filmed at different frame sizes, or aspect ratios. "Lady Bird", shot in widescreen should appear differently than "Star Wars", which was shot in Cinemascope. A Cinemascope movie on your TV will have black bars on the top and bottom, while a movie theater masks the frame with retractable curtains. These curtains at Night Hawk Cinema in Brooklyn absorb the light and create a frame around the projected image. But take away the curtains and...

Chapin Cutler: When you don't have masking what happens is you've got this gray area of screen which isn't reflecting picture, it's not reflecting the image. It just sort-of sits there and looks ugly. There is a move afoot by some theater circuits, I guess in order to save money, that have decided that, that's a waste of money and they're not gonna do it.

Narrator: That's Chapin Cutler. He's been working in the projection and theater business for over 40 years. The empty screen space can be distracting and takes away from the immersive experience of seeing a movie on the big screen.

Another problem? Projector brightness, which can be affected by the age and cleanliness of the bulb, along with any dirt or smudges that may be on the window of the projection booth. Some "Solo" attendees reported seeing extremely dark almost unviewable projections with a few saying that they had to struggle to see what was on screen.

Chapin Cutler: If the standard that's been established for the amount of light that is supposed to be on the screen isn't there, then not only does the picture look dark but you don't see anything that goes on in the shadows. All of that information disappears.

Narrator: And if there was a 3D showing in the theater before a standard 2D showing a lens meant only for 3D movies may still be on the projector making the image two thirds darker than it should be.

Joe Muto: Showing something like that with a very low light level is gonna take away from it. If that's the experience you walk away with that's going to impede your positive judgment of the film, and that's just gonna ruin it for you.

Narrator: Hurting both the team behind the movie and its viewers, and possibly creating customers who may not come back to that theater for a sub-par experience.

The issues aren't limited to "Solo." The past few years have seen numerous reports of theaters not doing enough to ensure quality screenings. Standard 2D movie tickets average about $9.00 in the U.S. And almost twice that in places like New York City. But is the price of admission worth seeing a movie that is not being shown the way it is meant to? You can get a full 4K movie for 15 bucks. Why bother with what may be a questionable theater presentation if you can get cinema-like quality at home?

The picture may be bigger, and the sound may be better but if you're having a bad theater experience, take note. If a theater has a dark blurry picture or leaves empty areas of the screen unmasked try a different theater. Many are still working hard to bring you the best picture possible.

EDITOR'S NOTE: This video was originally published in July 2018.

Join the conversation about this story »

Movie theaters had their best pandemic weekend yet as cinema chains loosen mask rules


A Quiet Place Part II

Summary List Placement

Movie theatre-going appears to be roaring back, even after some industry watchers speculated the pandemic would kill traditional cinema forever.

US screens pulled in $84 million in sales from new releases over the four-day Memorial Day weekend, Hollywood's best since the beginning of the pandemic, CNBC reported.

The record weekend came in conjunction with looser mask mandates at the nation's largest movie theatre chains. AMC Entertainment, Cinemark, and Regal cinemas in May no longer required vaccinated people to wear masks in accordance with CDC guidance, per their websites.

"A Quiet Place Part ll" led the weekend. The sequel is the biggest US box office hit since the beginning of the pandemic, raking in $57 million over the course of the four-day Memorial Day weekend, according to Box Office estimates. It's in theaters only until July 12, when it will be offered on Paramount's streaming platform.

Warner Bros.' "Godzilla vs. Kong" previously was the best opening yet for a movie at the domestic box office during the pandemic, bringing in $48 million over a five-day period. 

Another sizable chunk in sales was driven by Disney's "Cruella," which brought in $26.5 million between Friday and Monday. Disney opted to debut the movie simultaneously in theatres and on its Disney+ streaming platform for an extra $30.

The streaming move was adopted by many in the industry during the pandemic, amid lockdowns and a rise in demand for at-home entertainment. The streaming market has seen booming business since March 2020, and the industry is still heating up.

Warner Bros. led the charge in late 2020 when it said it would release its films in theatres and on its HBO Max streaming service at the same time. The decision angered many in the film-making world, including Director Christopher Nolan, who worried that the move would lead to the death of traditional cinema.

"Some of our industry's biggest filmmakers and most important movie stars went to bed the night before thinking they were working for the greatest movie studio and woke up to find out they were working for the worst streaming service," Nolan said in early December. 

Read more: HBO Max's chief breaks down the seismic decision to stream all 2021 Warner Bros. movies as they hit theaters and responds to speculation about 2022 and beyond

But in early April, WarnerMedia CEO Jason Kilar said the company's biggest films would be released in theatres in 2022 first before heading to HBO Max. Films slated to be released in 2021, like DC's "The Suicide Squad" sequel, will still be shown on HBO Max.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why 'moist' is one of the most hated words in the English language

The top 6 new movie releases in June, from 'Fast and Furious 9' to 'In the Heights'


fast and furious 9

Summary List Placement

6. "Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway"— in theaters June 11

Description:"Bea, Thomas, and the rabbits have created a makeshift family, but despite his best efforts, Peter can't seem to shake his mischievous reputation. Adventuring out of the garden, Peter finds himself in a world where his mischief is appreciated, but when his family risks everything to come looking for him, Peter must figure out what kind of bunny he wants to be."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 73%

What critics said: "This instalment of Peter Rabbit is filtered through the kind of sly self-awareness that suggests the film-makers took on board the criticisms of the previous film and decided to run with them."— Observer

5. "Luca"— on Disney+ June 18

Description: "Set in a beautiful seaside town on the Italian Riviera, Disney and Pixar's original feature film 'Luca' is a coming-of-age story about one young boy experiencing an unforgettable summer filled with gelato, pasta and endless scooter rides. Luca shares these adventures with his newfound best friend, but all the fun is threatened by a deeply-held secret: they are sea monsters from another world just below the water's surface."

4. "Hitman's Wife's Bodyguard"— in theaters June 16

Description: "The world's most lethal odd couple — bodyguard Michael Bryce (Ryan Reynolds) and hitman Darius Kincaid (Samuel L. Jackson) — are back on another life-threatening mission. Still unlicensed and under scrutiny, Bryce is forced into action by Darius's even more volatile wife, the infamous international con artist Sonia Kincaid (Salma Hayek). As Bryce is driven over the edge by his two most dangerous protectees, the trio get in over their heads in a global plot and soon find that they are all that stand between Europe and a vengeful and powerful madman (Antonio Banderas). Joining in the fun and deadly mayhem is Morgan Freeman as ... well, you'll have to see."

3. "In the Heights"— in theaters and on HBO Max June 11

Description: "Lights up on Washington Heights ... The scent of a cafecito caliente hangs in the air just outside of the 181st Street subway stop, where a kaleidoscope of dreams rallies this vibrant and tight-knit community. At the intersection of it all is the likeable, magnetic bodega owner Usnavi (Anthony Ramos), who saves every penny from his daily grind as he hopes, imagines and sings about a better life."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 99%

What critics said: "With 'In the Heights,' Chu delivers the Latino equivalent of his previous box office smash 'Crazy Rich Asians' and knocks it out of the park."— The Wrap

2. "The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It"— in theaters and on HBO Max June 4

Description: "'The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It' reveals a chilling story of terror, murder and unknown evil that shocked even experienced real-life paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren. One of the most sensational cases from their files, it starts with a fight for the soul of a young boy, then takes them beyond anything they'd ever seen before, to mark the first time in U.S. history that a murder suspect would claim demonic possession as a defense."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 81%

What critics said: "The caveated effectiveness of The Conjuring 3 should be a reminder to studios that treating a horror film like a sumptuously crafted event is something worth indulging in more often."— The Guardian

1. "F9"— in theaters June 25

Description: "Vin Diesel's Dom Toretto is leading a quiet life off the grid with Letty and his son, little Brian, but they know that danger always lurks just over their peaceful horizon. This time, that threat will force Dom to confront the sins of his past if he's going to save those he loves most. His crew joins together to stop a world-shattering plot led by the most skilled assassin and high-performance driver they've ever encountered: a man who also happens to be Dom's forsaken brother, Jakob."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 65%

What critics said: "The world of 'Fast & Furious' has never felt more outta control than it does here, but for the first time in a long time it feels like it's drifting in the right direction again."— Indiewire

Movie theater chain Alamo Drafthouse says it's reopening 5 US locations just 3 months after filing for bankruptcy


alamo drafthouse

Summary List Placement

Specialty movie theater chain Alamo Drafthouse said it is opening five US locations, just three months after filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

The new theaters will be in Manhattan and Staten Island, two in Washington DC, and one in St. Louis, according to a press release shared with Insider. Alamo Drafthouse's specialty is serving food and cocktails to customers in their seats while they watch the movie.

Alamo Drafthouse CEO Shelli Taylor said in the press release that "we're so thrilled to be reopening theaters across the country and welcoming back audiences for an unparalleled moviegoing experience with films we've been eagerly awaiting for over a year now."

The theater industry was slammed by health protocols and shutdowns during the pandemic as people were driven into their homes and turned to streaming entertainment. US theaters were closed from March to August 2020, and Alamo Drafthouse furloughed its workforce.

The Austin, Texas-based company said in March that its bankruptcy filing was part of a sale of "substantially all its assets." The company runs more than 40 locations across the country and said in March that it would close some that were struggling.

But cinemas appear to be bouncing back as vaccines are distributed and restrictions are loosened. Warner Bros. released "Godzilla vs. Kong" in April, and the movie earned $48 million in its opening weekend, signaling hope for cinemas. 

Read more:China's box-office dominance was accelerated by the pandemic and it has big implications for Hollywood's future

US movie theaters saw their best performance over the four-day Memorial Day weekend since the start of the pandemic in March 2020. The country's largest chains — AMC Entertainment, Cinemark, and Regal Cinemas — announced just before the weekend kicked off that they wouldn't require vaccinated movie-goers to wear masks.

Domestic box offices raked in $84 million over the long weekend, sales that were largely driven by "A Quiet Place Part ll." The movie is now the biggest US box office hit since the pandemic began.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what it's like to travel during the coronavirus outbreak

Lin-Manuel Miranda's 'In the Heights' is coming to HBO Max on June 10, but you'll need the ad-free plan to stream it


in the heights usnavi

Summary List PlacementMax (ad-free) (small)

Warner Bros. is bringing Broadway to Hollywood with "In the Heights," a feature-length movie based on the popular Tony Award-winning musical by Lin-Manuel Miranda. The film is set to premiere June 10 in theaters and on HBO Max.

The movie follows a Washington Heights bodega owner, Usnavi, as he "imagines and sings" about a better life, according to the film's official synopsis. "Hamilton" actor Anthony Ramos stars as Usnavi, while Corey Hawkins ("The Walking Dead"), Melissa Barrera ("Vida"), and Olga Merediz (Broadway's "In The Heights") round out the cast.

"In the Heights'' features music by Miranda and is directed by Jon M. Chu, the filmmaker behind "Crazy Rich Asians." The film received critical acclaim and currently holds a "99% Fresh" rating on review aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes.

Aside from "In the Heights," you can find Miranda's 2020 musical film "Hamilton" on Disney Plus. Disney Plus starts at $8 a month, and you can bundle the service with Hulu Basic and ESPN+ for $14 a month.

Where to watch 'In the Heights'

"In the Heights" will premiere on June 10 in theaters and online via HBO Max's ad-free plan. The film is one of a number of Warner Bros. movies premiering on the streaming service and in theaters on the same day. The movie's initial run on HBO Max will only last for 31 days, but it's possible it could be added back at a later date.

HBO Max has two plans: a $10 a month ad-supported plan and a $15 a month ad-free plan. You'll need the $15 a month plan to watch "In the Heights." HBO Max no longer offers a free trial through its website, but new members can get a seven-day trial with the HBO Max add-on for Hulu.

You can watch "In the Heights" on HBO Max through a number of media players including iOS and Android devices, most smart TVs, Roku, Fire TV, Chromecast, Apple TV, and more. Click here for a full list of HBO Max's supported devices.

The film will be available to stream in advanced video and audio formats such as Dolby Atmos, Dolby Vision, HDR, and 4K. You can check to see if your device supports these formats on HBO Max here.

What else can I watch on HBO Max?

HBO Max is known for its catalog of binge-worthy shows including "The Sopranos,""The Wire,""Curb Your Enthusiasm,""Game of Thrones," and more. 

Other upcoming Warner Bros. films set to arrive on HBO Max include "The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It" on June 4, "Space Jam: A New Legacy" on July 16, and "The Suicide Squad" on July 30.

You can read our full HBO Max review here, and our guide to HBO Max streaming here.

Max (ad-free) (small)

Join the conversation about this story »

'Raya and the Last Dragon' is now available to all Disney Plus subscribers without an extra fee — here's how to watch at home


raya and the last dragon disney plus

Summary List PlacementMonthly Subscription Service (small)"Raya and The Last Dragon" (small)

Dragons, warriors, and the mystical land of Kumandra are ready to take the Disney universe by storm in "Raya and the Last Dragon."

The action-adventure film starring the voices of Kelly Marie Tran and Awkwafina debuted on Disney Plus as a Premier Access title on March 5. As of June 4, the film is available to all subscribers for no additional cost. You can also buy the movie through VOD services like Vudu, Prime Video, and FandangoNow for $20.

"Raya and the Last Dragon" focuses on Raya (Tran), a warrior who embarks on a quest to defeat an evil force plaguing her land. In order to restore peace, Raya must find the last dragon. The film comes from director Don Hall, known for his work on "Moana," and director Carlos López Estrada, whose previous work includes "Blindspotting," a dramedy starring Daveed Diggs.

How to watch 'Raya and the Last Dragon' on Disney Plus

"Raya and the Last Dragon" debuted on Disney Plus on March 5 as a Premier Access title. Though it originally cost an extra $30 to unlock, the film became available to all subscribers for no additional fee on June 4. 

Disney Plus costs $8 a month or $80 for an annual plan. You can also pair Disney Plus with ESPN+ and Hulu to watch sports and tons of additional shows and movies. The bundle costs $14 a month, which saves you about $6 a month compared to buying all three services on their own.

The Disney Plus app is available on popular media devices such as Roku, Apple TV, Chromecast, Amazon Fire TV, and most smart TV brands. 

How to watch 'Raya and the Last Dragon' without Disney Plus

Though "Raya and the Last Dragon" was initially exclusive to Disney Plus, the movie is now available to buy through other streaming retailers, including Vudu, Prime Video, FandangoNow, Google Play, Microsoft and Apple TV.

"Raya and The Last Dragon" (button)

The digital purchase costs $20 and does not require any additional subscription fee. Once you buy the movie, you'll be able to watch it as much as you like through the platform you choose. The film is available in up to 4K with HDR, Dolby Vision, and Dolby Atmos through select apps.

If you don't need to own the movie, however, it's cheaper to sign up for one month of Disney Plus ($8/month) to watch "Raya and the Last Dragon." Plans also give you access to thousands of titles from Pixar, Disney, Marvel, and more.

What other brand-new movies can I watch at home?

Disney isn't the only studio streaming new movies that were originally planned for theaters. Warner Bros. announced that it will release its entire 2021 movie lineup in theaters and on HBO Max at the same time. For instance, you can watch "In the Heights" when it premieres June 10 on HBO Max. 

Other studios, like Sony, Universal, Lionsgate, and Paramount also offer streaming rental or purchase options for select titles that were originally planned for theaters. "In-theater" digital rentals or purchases can be made through a variety of services, including Apple TV, Vudu, FandangoNow, and Google Play

For more information about digital rentals, check out our guide to streaming rental services.

Product Card (small)

Join the conversation about this story »

Former MoviePass executives settle FTC allegations that they 'took steps to block subscribers from using the service'



Summary List Placement

The Federal Trade Commission on Monday announced that it has settled with the top executives of MoviePass, the defunct movie ticket subscription startup, over allegations that they "took steps to block subscribers from using the service" and also "[failed] to secure subscribers' personal data."

Under the settlement, former MoviePass CEO Mitch Lowe and Ted Farnsworth, former CEO of MoviePass parent company Helios and Matheson, are "barred from misrepresenting their business and data security practices" in the future, according to the FTC press release outlining the settlement.

"MoviePass and its executives went to great lengths to deny consumers access to the service they paid for while also failing to secure their personal information," said Daniel Kaufman, the FTC's Acting Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection, in the release.

ted farnsworth mitch loweThe FTC complaint, which was reviewed by Insider, alleged that both Lowe and Farnsworth "knew of, ordered, or helped execute" a "password disruption program" that limited the ability of frequent MoviePass subscribers to use use the service.

The complaint cited an April 2018 email it obtained from Farnsworth's personal email that was sent to Lowe and others at the company. The email proposed a notice that falsely "informed subscribers that their account passwords were required to be reset due to 'suspicious activity or potential fraud.'"

The complaint alleged that both Lowe and Farnsworth were aware of the program's "deceptive nature," noting that despite one executive's warning that "there is a high risk this would catch the FTC's attention," Lowe went forward.

"Ok I get it," Lowe responded via email, according to the FTC complaint. "So let[']s try this with a small group. Let[']s say 2% of our highest volume users."

The FTC complaint substantiates Insider's reporting in its rise and fall story of MoviePass, which detailed how Lowe ordered that heavy users of MoviePass — also known as "power users"— be blocked from seeing "Avengers: Infinity War."

From the story:

Per Lowe's orders, MoviePass began limiting subscriber access ahead of the April release of the highly anticipated "Avengers: Infinity War," according to multiple former employees. They said Lowe ordered that the passwords of a small percentage of power users be changed, preventing them from logging onto the app and ordering tickets.

Insider contacted Lowe and Farnsworth's attorney for comment but did not get a response.

FTC Commissioner Rohit Chopra said in a tweet on Monday that because MoviePass is now out of business, having shut down in September of 2019, "the agency was unable to obtain restitution for Lowe's and Farnsworth's victims."

Last week, Lowe and Farnsworth agreed to a $400,000 settlement with four California District Attorneys' offices that had alleged "unlawful business practices."

MoviePass surged in popularity in the summer of 2017 after Helios and Matheson bought the service and drastically lowered the price to $10 a month to see a movie per day. But MoviePass burned through hundreds of millions of dollars and failed to find a business model that didn't lead to massive losses.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why some Coca-Cola bottles have a yellow cap

HBO Max's 'Friends' reunion drove more sign-ups than any of its other releases this year, new data suggests


friends reunion special 2021 key art poster

Summary List Placement

It looks like HBO Max's "Friends" reunion special was a massive hit for the WarnerMedia streaming service. 

"Friends: The Reunion," which debuted May 27 after a year-long delay due to the pandemic, drove more sign-ups to Max in its opening weekend in the US than any of Warner Bros.' new movies so far this year, according to the analytics company Antenna.

Antenna pulls data from a variety of opt-in panels like budgeting apps to track purchase and transaction data, not including free trials.

Last year, WarnerMedia announced that all of Warner Bros. 2021 movies would be released to theaters and on Max on the same day. The "Friends" special drove more sign-ups than those released so far this year, including "Mortal Kombat" and "Godzilla vs. Kong," as well as "Zack Snyder's Justice League," a Max exclusive.

The chart below illustrates the difference:

friends reunion hbo max antenna chart

"Wonder Woman 1984," which was released to theaters and Max simultaneously in December, is still Max's biggest sign-ups driver so far, according to Antenna.

But as vaccinations have risen in the US this year and more movie theaters have opened, viewers have seemed more comfortable heading to cinemas.

"Godzilla vs. Kong," for instance, is nearing $100 million at the domestic box office. It opened with $48 million domestically in March, a pandemic-best opening at the time (which was recently topped by Paramount's "A Quiet Place Part II").

Warner Bros. has largely dominated the box office so far this year despite its movies streaming simultaneously on Max. But as other studios finally release their delayed tentpoles, like Disney's "Black Widow" and Universal's "Fast and Furious 9," there could be more of a balance at the box office.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Sneaky ways stores like H&M, Zara, and Uniqlo get you to spend more money on clothes

The top 9 movies on Netflix this week, from 'Army of the Dead' to '2 Hearts'


army of the dead group

Summary List Placement

9. "Flipped" (2010)

Description: "Bryce and Juli first meet as children, with Juli having a crush on Bryce. As they mature, it appears their bond may blossom into something more."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 54%

What critics said: "At times, the movie feels like a commercial for Wonder Bread, stretched to feature length."— Washington Post

8. "Awake" (2021, Netflix original)

Description: "After a global event wipes out humanity's ability to sleep, a troubled ex-soldier fights to save her family as society and her mind spiral into chaos."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 33%

What critics said: "There is no getting around it: Mark Raso's 'Awake' is bad. But at least it's so bad that it's often ludicrously laughable: Netflix may well have a cult turkey on its hands."— New York Times

7. "The Mitchells vs. the Machines" (2021, Netflix original)

Description: "A robot apocalypse put the brakes on their cross-country road trip. Now it's up to the Mitchells — the world's weirdest family — to save the human race."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 98%

What critics said: "In 'The Mitchells vs. the Machines,' family life is a brilliant, ever-changing collage."— Associated Press

6. "Army of the Dead" (2021, Netflix original)

Description: "After a zombie outbreak in Las Vegas, a group of mercenaries takes the ultimate gamble by venturing into the quarantine zone for the greatest heist ever."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 69%

What critics said: "Death comes for us all, and if we're fortunate, it's a very slow walker. Enjoying 'Army of the Dead' doesn't require much more than appreciating that. Our collective starvation for thrills and wonder probably sauces its appeal even more."— Salon

5. "Xtreme" (2021, Netflix original)

Description: "In this fast-paced and action-packed thriller, a retired hitman — along with his sister and a troubled teen — takes revenge on his lethal stepbrother."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: N/A

What critics said: "Amplifies the representative elements with style, dark humor, and murderous pizzazz."— Decider

4. "Monsters vs. Aliens" (2009)

Description: "After Susan Murphy is struck by a meteor and grows to be 50 feet tall, she's captured by the government and shuttled to a secret compound."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 73%

What critics said: "Monsters vs Aliens is skilfully animated and spasmodically funny, but you get the impression the film's seven (!) writers ran out of ideas two-thirds of the way through."— Time Out

3. "Trouble" (2021, Netflix original)

Description: "The privileged life of a pampered dog named Trouble is turned upside-down when he gets lost and must learn to survive on the big-city streets."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: N/A

What critics said: "It has all the individuality of a dixie cup and just as disposable."— FilmWeek

2. "Home" (2015)

Description: "When misfit alien Oh mistakenly sends a party invite to the entire galaxy, he goes on the run to avoid trouble and befriends spunky human girl Tip."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 52%

What critics said: "When Tip and Oh realize how wrong they've been about so many things, they begin moving toward real maturity and growth. That's something viewers of all ages can appreciate."— Vox

1. "2 Hearts" (2020)

Description: "In parallel love stories, the lives of college student Chris and wealthy businessman Jorge intersect in a profound twist of fate. Based on a true story."

Rotten Tomatoes critic score: 17%

What critics said: "Skovbye and Mitchell are the biggest standouts, striving to bring believability and genuine emotion to the proceedings, but it's hard to resuscitate a project this far gone."— Entertainment Weekly

The director of James Bond movies 'Casino Royale' and 'GoldenEye' gives his take on the franchise's future under Amazon


casion royale

Summary List Placement

When Amazon announced last month that it would buy the MGM film studio, which distributes the James Bond movies, it prompted speculation that the long-running film franchise could expand into TV.

But producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson, who have creative control over the franchise, will have final say on that decision.

"No one's going to f--- around with their success," Martin Campbell, the director of Bond movies "GoldenEye" (1995) and "Casino Royale" (2006), told Insider. "It's Barbara and Michael's franchise no matter who's providing the money. They've been through many changes and regimes and survived them all."

Campbell, whose new movie "The Protégé" hits theaters in August, talked with Insider about Amazon's purchase of MGM and the franchise's future.

MGM splits the rights to the Bond movies with Broccoli and Wilson's company Danjaq, which owns Eon Productions. Eon has produced 24 Bond movies since 1962's "Dr. No" and the 25th entry, "No Time to Die," hits theaters in October after a year-and-a-half delay. 

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos has already said that the company intends to "reimagine" MGM IP "for the 21st century." The Bond franchise, which has grossed $7 billion over the two dozen films, would obviously be at the forefront of that plan — if Broccoli and Wilson go along with it.

Campbell's first instinct was to say that the duo would stick to theatrical features. There was never any talk of TV during his work with them, he said.

But he says to "never say never," adding that the producing team have shown a willingness to embrace change over the years. With "Casino Royale," the first feature starring Daniel Craig as Bond, the franchise went back to Bond's origins, detailing how he became the super spy that audiences know today. It was far more edgy than the previous Pierce Brosnan-starring era of the character, which Campbell also launched with "GoldenEye."

"They were all for roughing up Bond with 'Casino Royale,'" Campbell said. "There was no hesitation making it darker."

He noted the large action sequences and many locations of the Bond films ("Casino Royale" was filmed in five different countries, he said). A series would have to sustain that kind of scope, he said.

"Every Bond film is an event," Campbell said. "The sheer size would have to be maintained."

Amazon hasn't been shy about dropping loads of cash for its TV ambitions. Notably, it's spending $465 million for just one season of its upcoming "Lord of the Rings" TV series, including $250 million for the rights, according to The Hollywood Reporter. A sizable movie-like budget could possibly persuade Broccoli and Wilson.

The duo have shot down Bond TV ideas in the past, notably a "Smallville"-like series that would have followed a teenage Bond at Eton, according to Variety. But they've also seemed open to expanding the series outside of feature films.

"We make these films for the audiences," Broccoli told Variety in a rare interview last year. "We like to think that they're going to be seen primarily on the big screen. But having said that, we have to look to the future. Our fans are the ones who dictate how they want to consume their entertainment. I don't think we can rule anything out, because it's the audience that will make those decisions. Not us."

But what would a Bond TV show look like, aside from having a big budget? Campbell isn't sure about focusing on other characters: "I'm not sure who you'd spin off."  

"The movies have stuck to a formula: there's always a guy who wants to take over the world or something and Bond takes him down," Campbell said. 

He said that the most recent Craig movies have broken from the formula somewhat, with success. The four movies — and soon to be fifth and final Craig film — have been more connected than previous eras, telling a continuing story rather than being purely standalone entries. 

They have also portrayed women more respectfully than the Bond movies before them, in which women were mainly seen as "objects." Campbell said that the women of the Craig-era films have been "tougher and more self-reliant" (which he credits to Broccoli). Campbell imagines that a Bond TV show would need to exhibit these traits in order to be successful.

"If it nailed the quality, if there was an arc to the character, then yes, it could be done," Campbell said. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside a $3 million doomsday condo that can sustain 75 people for 5 years

'In the Heights' underwhelmed at the box office, but new data suggests it's not HBO Max's fault


in the heights usnavi

Summary List Placement

"In the Heights," the new movie based on the musical by Lin-Manuel Miranda, underwhelmed at the US box office over the weekend with $11.4 million.

Its haul was below projections that placed it closer to $20 million, and it failed to top "A Quiet Place Part II," which has been in theaters for two weeks.

The Warner Bros. film, which was directed by "Crazy Rich Asians" filmmaker Jon M. Chu, was released simultaneously on the WarnerMedia streaming service HBO Max over the weekend, as are all of Warner Bros.' films this year.

But data suggests that it's not Max's fault that the movie disappointed at the box office. It also underperformed on the streaming service compared to other new Warner Bros. movies.

693,000 US households watched at least five minutes of "In the Heights" on HBO Max over the weekend via connected TVs, according to estimates from the analytics company Samba TV. Samba TV tracks viewership on connected TVs, which include smart TVs, streaming devices like Roku, and gaming consoles. (WarnerMedia declined to provide viewership numbers for "In the Heights.")

Other Warner Bros. releases this year, which have performed better at the box office than "In the Heights" in their opening weekends, also drove more viewership on Max, according to Samba TV data. It suggests that streaming viewership doesn't necessarily cannibalize theatrical attendance.

Here are four Warner Bros. movies this year that debuted in theaters and on Max simultaneously, and how their opening weekends compared on Max (via Samba TV estimates) and at the box office in the US:

  • "Mortal Kombat"— 3.8 million households on Max / $23.3 million at box office
  • "Godzilla vs. Kong"— 3.6 million households on Max (five-day weekend) / $48.5 million at box office (five days)
  • "The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It"— 1.6 million households on Max / $24 million at box office
  • "Tom and Jerry"— 1.2 million households on Max / $14.1 million at box office

Warner Bros. head of domestic distribution Jeff Goldstein also implied "In the Heights" had underperformed relative to other releases in comments to the Associated Press on Sunday.

"Our experience, which is backed up on 'In the Heights,' is that if the movie hits a high level in theaters, it hits a high level on the service," Goldstein said. "If it hits a low level in theaters, it hits a low level on HBO Max. They're really very comparable."

While "In the Heights" didn't attract as big an audience in its debut as other Warner Bros. releases this year, it's been a hit with critics and has a 97% Rotten Tomatoes critic score. Viewers who did see the movie also seemed to love it; it has a 95% Rotten Tomatoes audience score and an A from CinemaScore, which surveys theatrical audiences on a movie's opening night. That means the movie could pick up steam from word-of-mouth buzz.

Warner Bros. has largely dominated the box office so far this year despite its movies also streaming, and "In the Heights" seems to be an exception.

The box office could look more balanced as more studios release delayed tentpole films this summer, though, including Disney's "Black Widow" and Universal's "Fast and Furious 9."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why I'm throwing away every plastic thing in my kitchen ASAP

Latest Images